These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17641260)

  • 1. Dignified death for severely impaired infants: beyond the best-interest standard.
    Weisleder P
    J Child Neurol; 2007 Jun; 22(6):737-40. PubMed ID: 17641260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rejecting the Baby Doe rules and defending a "negative" analysis of the Best Interests Standard.
    Kopelman LM
    J Med Philos; 2005 Aug; 30(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16029986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neonatal ethics at the limits of viability.
    McCullough LB
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):1019-21. PubMed ID: 16199718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neonatologists judge the "Baby Doe" regulations.
    Kopelman LM; Irons TG; Kopelman AE
    N Engl J Med; 1988 Mar; 318(11):677-83. PubMed ID: 3344019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are the 21-year-old Baby Doe rules misunderstood or mistaken?
    Kopelman LM
    Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):797-802. PubMed ID: 15741390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Creation of a neonatal end-of-life palliative-care protocol.
    Catlin A; Carter BS
    J Clin Ethics; 2001; 12(3):316-8. PubMed ID: 11878246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical practice and legal background of decisions for severely ill newborn infants: viewpoints from seven European countries.
    Sauer PJ; Dorscheidt JH; Verhagen AA; Hubben JH;
    Acta Paediatr; 2013 Feb; 102(2):e57-63. PubMed ID: 23194471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Helping infants by seeing the invisible.
    Howe EG
    J Clin Ethics; 2001; 12(3):191-204. PubMed ID: 11789062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Withholding treatment in terminally-ill newborns with Islamic parents].
    Westra AE; Smit BJ; Willems DL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Feb; 151(8):449-52. PubMed ID: 17378297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noninitiation or withdrawal of intensive care for high-risk newborns.
    ; Bell EF
    Pediatrics; 2007 Feb; 119(2):401-3. PubMed ID: 17272630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Futile care and the neonate.
    Romesberg TL
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2003 Oct; 3(5):213-9. PubMed ID: 14648518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Committee review for handicapped newborn care.
    Diamond EF
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Apr; 13(2):48-9. PubMed ID: 6222014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Palliative care in the fetus and newborn.
    Bhatia J
    J Perinatol; 2006 May; 26 Suppl 1():S24-6; discussion S31-3. PubMed ID: 16625220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The best-interest standard is not applied for neonatal resuscitation decisions.
    Janvier A; Leblanc I; Barrington KJ
    Pediatrics; 2008 May; 121(5):963-9. PubMed ID: 18450900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resuscitation of likely nonviable newborns: would neonatology practices in California change if the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act were enforced?
    Partridge JC; Sendowski MD; Drey EA; Martinez AM
    Pediatrics; 2009 Apr; 123(4):1088-94. PubMed ID: 19336366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reorientation of care in the NICU: a United States perspective.
    McGraw M; Perlman J
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Oct; 13(5):310-1. PubMed ID: 18539103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infants of borderline viability: ethical and clinical considerations.
    Chiswick M
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Feb; 13(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 17993295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The responsibility of standards committees].
    Arena Ansotegui J
    An Esp Pediatr; 2001 Dec; 55(6):580; author reply 581-2. PubMed ID: 11730598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Legal aspects of end-of-life decisions in Italy: the penal relevance of the limitation of treatment in the terminally ill and the problem of causality by omission. The legal puzzle of end-of-life care in Italy: is therapeutic limitation in the terminally ill patients a crime of omission liable to prosecution?
    Fabris EP; Piccinni M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl; 2008; 42():58-65. PubMed ID: 18289418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.