186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17642028)
21. Translating civilian and defense technologies for pediatric critical care and rehabilitation research.
Wagner NJ; Quatrano LA; Nicholson CE
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 16556963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The growth of biomedical engineering is a major challenge to medical physics. For the proposition.
Kruger RL
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2375-6. PubMed ID: 15487714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Engineers in clinical engineering: does the need remain?
Schrenker R
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1996; 30(2):178-80. PubMed ID: 8673169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Designs for rehabilitation.
Harrison MS
Rehabil Rec; 1967; 8(6):20-1. PubMed ID: 5584485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Organization of medical research around biomedical engineering.
Kolff WJ
Ann Biomed Eng; 1974 Sep; 2(3):iii-v. PubMed ID: 4499991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Integrating clinical engineering and information systems.
Hatem MB
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1999; 33(4):295-7. PubMed ID: 10459412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Growth in rehabilitation: Dr. Geoff Fernie's continuous efforts to make injured lives worth living.
Maitland P
Healthc Q; 2007; 10(2):22-4. PubMed ID: 17491562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Advances in biomedical engineering.
Griffith LG; Grodzinsky AJ
JAMA; 2001 Feb; 285(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 11176858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rehabilitation engineering at Rancho Los Amigos Hospital.
Clin Eng News; 1976 Nov; 4(6):5-6. PubMed ID: 1028545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Occupational therapy and engineering: Being better together.
Mihailidis A; Polgar JM
Can J Occup Ther; 2016 Apr; 83(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 27026718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Criteria for successful uptake of AAL technologies: lessons learned from Norwegian pilot projects.
Svagård I; Ausen D; Standal K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 189():200-5. PubMed ID: 23739382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Devices for dignity--from there, to here and beyond.
Tindale WB
J Med Eng Technol; 2014; 39(7):376-7. PubMed ID: 26399388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The rehabilitation engineering program.
Traub JE; Leclair RR
Am Rehabil; 1975; 1(2):3-7. PubMed ID: 1217582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Assistive devices: empowerment issues.
Fiedler I
WMJ; 1997 Dec; 96(12):28-31. PubMed ID: 9433173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical engineering trends for 1983.
Clin Eng Inf Serv; 1983; 7(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 10260711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. (REDU) rehabilitation equipment demonstration units: giving (re)-birth to a great idea.
Dietl D
J Rehabil; 1980; 46(3):20-2. PubMed ID: 7401087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Rehabilitation engineering.
Iles G
N Z Nurs J; 1982 Sep; 75(9):7-9. PubMed ID: 6959043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Collaborative bioengineering: clinical activities in Ireland.
Prendergast PJ; Gorey TF
Ir J Med Sci; 1999; 168(1):2. PubMed ID: 10098332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Technology management in the health care environment--yesterday, today, and tomorrow: Part 2.
Short B; Nobel J; Carver M; Tanner L; Ridgway M; Hargest T; Keil O; Stiefel R
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1990; 24(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 2261578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The challenges ahead.
Loughlin S
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2011; 45(2):84. PubMed ID: 21466313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
