BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17642035)

  • 1. Genome size estimations on Ulmus minor Mill., Ulmus glabra Huds., and Celtis australis L. using flow cytometry.
    Loureiro J; Rodriguez E; Gomes A; Santos C
    Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2007 Jul; 9(4):541-4. PubMed ID: 17642035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of airborne Ulmaceae pollen in Modena (northern Italy).
    Torri P; Accorsi CA; Bandini Mazzanti M; Zagni AM
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 1997; 16(2-3):227-30. PubMed ID: 9276007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flow cytometric analysis of genome size variation in some Passiflora species.
    Souza MM; Palomino G; Pereira TN; Pereira MG; Viana AP
    Hereditas; 2004; 141(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15383069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genome size variation in the common frog Rana temporaria.
    Matsuba C; Merilä J
    Hereditas; 2006 Dec; 143(2006):155-8. PubMed ID: 17362349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ulmus americana (Ulmaceae) is a polyploid complex.
    Whittemore AT; Olsen RT
    Am J Bot; 2011 Apr; 98(4):754-60. PubMed ID: 21613171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bud dormancy release in elm (Ulmus spp.) clones--a case study of photoperiod and temperature responses.
    Ghelardini L; Santini A; Black-Samuelsson S; Myking T; Falusi M
    Tree Physiol; 2010 Feb; 30(2):264-74. PubMed ID: 20022864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliable flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in coffee trees.
    Barre P; Noirot M; Louarn J; Duperray C; Hamon S
    Cytometry; 1996 May; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 8723900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genome size determination in chagas disease transmitting bugs (hemiptera-triatominae) by flow cytometry.
    Panzera F; Ferrandis I; Ramsey J; Salazar-Schettino PM; Cabrera M; Monroy C; Bargues MD; Mas-Coma S; O'Connor JE; Angulo VM; Jaramillo N; Pérez R
    Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2007 Mar; 76(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 17360877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodology significantly affects genome size estimates: quantitative evidence using bryophytes.
    Bainard JD; Fazekas AJ; Newmaster SG
    Cytometry A; 2010 Aug; 77(8):725-32. PubMed ID: 20653012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An improved method of genome size estimation by flow cytometry in five mucilaginous species of Hyacinthaceae.
    Nath S; Mallick SK; Jha S
    Cytometry A; 2014 Oct; 85(10):833-40. PubMed ID: 24853918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA index, genome size, and electronic nuclear volume of vertebrates from the Miami Metro Zoo.
    Krishan A; Dandekar P; Nathan N; Hamelik R; Miller C; Shaw J
    Cytometry A; 2005 May; 65(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 15779063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DNA content in Eurasian sturgeon species determined by flow cytometry.
    Birstein VJ; Poletaev AI; Goncharov BF
    Cytometry; 1993; 14(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 8513694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-throughput monitoring of plant nuclear DNA contents via flow cytometry.
    Galbraith DW; Lambert GM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 918():311-25. PubMed ID: 22893296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nuclear genome size: are we getting closer?
    Dolezel J; Greilhuber J
    Cytometry A; 2010 Jul; 77(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 20583277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of four nuclear isolation buffers for plant DNA flow cytometry.
    Loureiro J; Rodriguez E; Dolezel J; Santos C
    Ann Bot; 2006 Sep; 98(3):679-89. PubMed ID: 16820407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry.
    Dolezel J; Greilhuber J; Suda J
    Nat Protoc; 2007; 2(9):2233-44. PubMed ID: 17853881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Precise DNA cytometry: investigation of individual variability in animal genome size].
    Rozanov IuM; Vinogradov AE
    Tsitologiia; 1998; 40(8-9):792-800. PubMed ID: 9821251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoreduplicative standards for calibration of flow cytometric C-Value measurements.
    Galbraith DW
    Cytometry A; 2014 Apr; 85(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 24415326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allozyme variation in Ulmus species from France: analysis of differentiation.
    Machon N; Lefranc M; Bilger I; Mazer SJ; Sarr A
    Heredity (Edinb); 1997 Jan; 78(Pt 1):12-20. PubMed ID: 16397633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation of the genome size estimate with environmental conditions in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Nardon C; Weiss M; Vieira C; Biémont C
    Cytometry A; 2003 Sep; 55(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 12938187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.