These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1764350)

  • 41. Steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials from stimulation of visual field quadrants. Optimizing pattern variables for the size of the field to be investigated.
    Bradnam M; Keating D; Montgomery D; Evans A; Damato B; Cluckie A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 79(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 1591969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
    Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Age-related features of the resting pattern-reversal visual evoked response using the dipole localization method and cortical imaging technique.
    Sidman RD; Major DJ; Ford MR; Ramsey GG; Schlichting C
    J Neurosci Methods; 1991 Mar; 37(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 2072735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Low- and high-frequency evoked responses following pattern reversal stimuli: a MEG study supported by fMRI constraint.
    Perfetti B; Franciotti R; Della Penna S; Ferretti A; Caulo M; Romani GL; Onofrj M
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(3):1152-67. PubMed ID: 17337346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of pattern-onset, -reversal and -offset VEPs in treated amblyopia.
    Shawkat FS; Kriss A; Timms C; Taylor DS
    Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 5)():863-9. PubMed ID: 10070525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field.
    Baseler HA; Sutter EE; Klein SA; Carney T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jan; 90(1):65-81. PubMed ID: 7509275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Study of the human visual cortex: direct cortical evoked potentials and stimulation.
    Farrell DF; Leeman S; Ojemann GA
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 24(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17277570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of experimental scotomata on sequential pattern-onset, pattern-reversal and pattern-offset visual evoked potentials.
    Shawkat FS; Kriss A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1997-1998; 94(4):307-20. PubMed ID: 9858091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Simulated nystagmus reduces pattern-reversal more strongly than pattern-onset multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Hoffmann MB; Seufert PS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1723-32. PubMed ID: 15908272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Sequential spatial maps of visual potentials evoked by checkerboard-pattern reversal: effect of the retinal field stimulated on response topography].
    Mauguière F; Giard MH; Ibañez V; Pernier J
    Rev Electroencephalogr Neurophysiol Clin; 1985 Sep; 15(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 4070725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The neurophysiologic significance of frontal negativity in pattern-reversal visual-evoked potentials.
    Kurita-Tashima S; Tobimatsu S; Nakayama-Hiromatsu M; Kato M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Jul; 33(8):2423-8. PubMed ID: 1634339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Localizing sites of activation in primary visual cortex using visual-evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Baker S; Baseler H; Klein S; Carney T
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 23(5):404-15. PubMed ID: 17016150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On determining the intracranial sources of visual evoked potentials from scalp topography: a reply to Kelly et al. (this issue).
    Ales JM; Yates JL; Norcia AM
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():703-11. PubMed ID: 22982584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Principal components and multidimensional scaling of auditory and visual event-related potential topography.
    Pollock VE; Cliff N
    Brain Topogr; 1992; 5(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 1463659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of check size and stimulation rate on blue-yellow multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Martins A; Klistorner A; Graham S; Billson F
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 32(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 15180839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Variability on serial testing of pattern reversal visual evoked potential latencies from full-field, half-field and foveal stimulation in control subjects.
    Hammond SR; MacCallum S; Yiannikas C; Walsh JC; McLeod JG
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Apr; 66(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 2435520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in fencers.
    Taddei F; Viggiano MP; Mecacci L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1991 Dec; 11(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 1797759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Analysis of pattern-reversal visual evoked-potential topography: replicability in normal subjects and comparisons with Alzheimer's disease.
    Pollock VE; Cliff N
    Psychophysiology; 1992 Nov; 29(6):712-33. PubMed ID: 1461959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pattern-onset visual evoked potentials: more useful than reversal for patients with nystagmus.
    Saunders KJ; Brown G; McCulloch DL
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1997-1998; 94(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 9682995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Modifications of the pattern-evoked potential (PEP) in relation to the stimulated part of the visual field (clues for the most probable origin of each component).
    Lesevre N; Joseph JP
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1979 Aug; 47(2):183-203. PubMed ID: 95712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.