These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17643737)

  • 41. How to build an efficient conservation fence.
    Bode M; Wintle B
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Feb; 24(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 19604295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Adaptive management of natural resources--framework and issues.
    Williams BK
    J Environ Manage; 2011 May; 92(5):1346-53. PubMed ID: 21075505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Making decentralised systems viable: a guide to managing decentralised assets and risks.
    Willetts J; Fane S; Mitchell C
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):165-73. PubMed ID: 17881850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A review of climate-change adaptation strategies for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation.
    Mawdsley JR; O'Malley R; Ojima DS
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Oct; 23(5):1080-9. PubMed ID: 19549219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sensitivity analyses of spatial population viability analysis models for species at risk and habitat conservation planning.
    Naujokaitis-Lewis IR; Curtis JM; Arcese P; Rosenfeld J
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 18798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Protected areas in Europe: principle and practice.
    Gaston KJ; Jackson SF; Nagy A; Cantú-Salazar L; Johnson M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008; 1134():97-119. PubMed ID: 18566091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Environmental history: a piece in the puzzle for establishing plans for environmental management.
    Renberg I; Bigler C; Richard Bindler ; Matilda Norberg ; Johan Rydberg ; Ulf Segerström
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2794-800. PubMed ID: 19395150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A multi-scale modelling approach for analysing landscape service dynamics.
    Willemen L; Veldkamp A; Verburg PH; Hein L; Leemans R
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Jun; 100():86-95. PubMed ID: 22366361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Managing trade-offs in landscape restoration and revegetation projects.
    Maron M; Cockfield G
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Dec; 18(8):2041-9. PubMed ID: 19263896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A GIS-based protocol for the collection and use of local knowledge in fisheries management planning.
    Close CH; Hall GB
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Mar; 78(4):341-52. PubMed ID: 16115723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Demarcating coastal vegetation buffers with multicriteria evaluation and GIS at Saldanha Bay, South Africa.
    van der Merwe JH; Lohrentz G
    Ambio; 2001 Mar; 30(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 11374311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Active adaptive management for conservation.
    McCarthy MA; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):956-63. PubMed ID: 17650246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Transboundary impacts on regional ground water modeling in Texas.
    Rainwater K; Stovall J; Frailey S; Urban L
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(5):706-16. PubMed ID: 16149966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sense of place as a determinant of people's attitudes towards the environment: implications for natural resources management and planning in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.
    Larson S; De Freitas DM; Hicks CC
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Mar; 117():226-34. PubMed ID: 23376305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
    Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of weed-management burning on reptile assemblages in Australian tropical savannas.
    Valentine LE; Schwarzkopf L
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 18950473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Between a rock and a hard place: incompatible objectives at the heart of river basin planning?
    Blackstock KL
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(3):425-31. PubMed ID: 19213996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Are incentive programs working? Landowner attitudes to ecological restoration of agricultural landscapes.
    Jellinek S; Parris KM; Driscoll DA; Dwyer PD
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127():69-76. PubMed ID: 23685119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Modelling the effects of water-point closure and fencing removal: a GIS approach.
    Graz FP; Westbrooke ME; Florentine SK
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Aug; 104():186-94. PubMed ID: 22542930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cost-effective river rehabilitation planning: optimizing for morphological benefits at large spatial scales.
    Langhans SD; Hermoso V; Linke S; Bunn SE; Possingham HP
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():296-303. PubMed ID: 24325822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.