396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17643754)
21. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017.
Glimelius B
Acta Oncol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 29303398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A Vibrant Community of Readers, Authors and Reviewers: A Medical Editors' Necessity and a Challenge for Medical Education.
Escada P; Donato H; Villanueva T
Acta Med Port; 2019 Mar; 32(3):171-172. PubMed ID: 30946784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary.
Allen LA; Ho PM
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29237748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Conflict of interest. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(8):646-7. PubMed ID: 8452334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Der Orthopäde and the impact factor].
Kohn D; Ewerbeck V
Orthopade; 2015 Oct; 44(10):741. PubMed ID: 26376985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Standard requirements for the preparation of manuscripts submitted for publication in the journal Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny.
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2004; 55(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 15332315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Trends in scientific publishing: Dark clouds loom large.
Vinny PW; Vishnu VY; Lal V
J Neurol Sci; 2016 Apr; 363():119-20. PubMed ID: 27000235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. ERJ peer reviewers: does this pillar of the Journal's quality need help?
Migliori GB; Soriano JB; Brusasco V; Dinh-Xuan AT
Eur Respir J; 2011 Aug; 38(2):251-2. PubMed ID: 22741165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Peer review: purpose, process and publication.
Thistlethwaite J
Clin Teach; 2012 Aug; 9(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 22783849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. How Publish or Perish Promotes Inaccuracy in Science -- and Journalism.
Oransky I
AMA J Ethics; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1172-5. PubMed ID: 26698592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The European Heart Journal on the move: can scientific publishing be further improved?
Lüscher TF; Gersh B; Hindricks G; Landmesser U; Nallamothu B; Ruschitzka F; Wijns W
Eur Heart J; 2013 Feb; 34(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 23132609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [How to make out misuse of statistics in manuscripts or papers quickly and accurately].
Hu LP; Liu HG
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2007 Jan; 5(1):97-100. PubMed ID: 17214946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Editors' clubs benefit researchers and trainees.
Catania EH; Seale KT
Dis Model Mech; 2009; 2(1-2):7. PubMed ID: 19132110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [A guide to the peer review of scientific papers].
Giunta RE; Prommersberger KJ
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2012 Aug; 44(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 22836956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Editorial introspection: problems of a successful peer reviewed journal.
Rossdale PD
Equine Vet J; 1998 Jan; 30(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 9480209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Editorial address at the beginning of the new decade].
Göbel U; Gortner L
Klin Padiatr; 2010 Mar; 222(2):53-5. PubMed ID: 20309817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. More on peer review: quality control for a costly product.
Newton M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Sep; 15(6):439-42. PubMed ID: 18696135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Behind the curtain: a look inside the publication process.
Ludwig RL; Kellogg A
Radiol Technol; 2014; 86(1):90-2. PubMed ID: 25224088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
