BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17643898)

  • 1. An empirical characterization of the quality of DTI data and the efficacy of dyadic sorting.
    Yanasak NE; Allison JD; Hu TC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 26(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 17643898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of diffusion weighting schemes on the reproducibility of DTI-derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5T.
    Landman BA; Farrell JA; Jones CK; Smith SA; Prince JL; Mori S
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17532649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of capillaries in the construction of an MRI phantom for the assessment of diffusion tensor imaging: demonstration of performance.
    Yanasak N; Allison J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(10):1349-61. PubMed ID: 17145407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of diffusion tensor imaging measurements at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T with and without parallel imaging.
    Alexander AL; Lee JE; Wu YC; Field AS
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2006 May; 16(2):299-309, xi. PubMed ID: 16731368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of measurement uncertainties in human diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived parameters and optimization of clinical DTI protocols with a wild bootstrap analysis.
    Zhu T; Liu X; Gaugh MD; Connelly PR; Ni H; Ekholm S; Schifitto G; Zhong J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):422-35. PubMed ID: 19161198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Signal to noise ratio and uncertainty in diffusion tensor imaging at 1.5, 3.0, and 7.0 Tesla.
    Polders DL; Leemans A; Hendrikse J; Donahue MJ; Luijten PR; Hoogduin JM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jun; 33(6):1456-63. PubMed ID: 21591016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diffusion tensor imaging: structural adaptive smoothing.
    Tabelow K; Polzehl J; Spokoiny V; Voss HU
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1763-73. PubMed ID: 18060811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusion tensor MRI in rat models of invasive and well-demarcated brain tumors.
    Kim S; Pickup S; Hsu O; Poptani H
    NMR Biomed; 2008 Mar; 21(3):208-16. PubMed ID: 17530617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple echo diffusion tensor acquisition technique.
    Sigmund EE; Song YQ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jan; 24(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 16410173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DTI at 7 and 3 T: systematic comparison of SNR and its influence on quantitative metrics.
    Choi S; Cunningham DT; Aguila F; Corrigan JD; Bogner J; Mysiw WJ; Knopp MV; Schmalbrock P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jul; 29(6):739-51. PubMed ID: 21571473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel diffusion anisotropy indices: an evaluation.
    Wang JJ; Chao TC; Wai YY; Hsu Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):211-7. PubMed ID: 16758480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diffusion tensor and tensor metrics imaging in intracranial epidermoid cysts.
    Santhosh K; Thomas B; Radhakrishnan VV; Saini J; Kesavadas C; Gupta AK; Kapilamoorthy TR; Nair SN
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 29(4):967-70. PubMed ID: 19306444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A practical approach to in vivo high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging of rhesus monkeys on a 3-T human scanner.
    Liu X; Zhu T; Gu T; Zhong J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 27(3):335-46. PubMed ID: 18768280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward a practical protocol for human optic nerve DTI with EPI geometric distortion correction.
    Techavipoo U; Okai AF; Lackey J; Shi J; Dresner MA; Leist TP; Lai S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Oct; 30(4):699-707. PubMed ID: 19787713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the human calf: comparison between 1.5 T and 3.0 T-preliminary results.
    Saupe N; White LM; Sussman MS; Kassner A; Tomlinson G; Noseworthy MD
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):612-8. PubMed ID: 18708854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of diffusion spectrum imaging and q-ball imaging on clinical MRI system.
    Kuo LW; Chen JH; Wedeen VJ; Tseng WY
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 41(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 18387822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous magnetic resonance imaging of diffusion anisotropy and diffusion gradient.
    Huang J; Zhu DC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Apr; 26(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 18093778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brainstem corticospinal tract diffusion tensor imaging in patients with primary posterior fossa neoplasms stratified by tumor type: a study of association with motor weakness and outcome.
    Lui YW; Law M; Chacko-Mathew J; Babb JS; Tuvia K; Allen JC; Zagzag D; Johnson G
    Neurosurgery; 2007 Dec; 61(6):1199-207; discussion 1207-8. PubMed ID: 18162899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of signal-to-noise ratio on the accuracy and reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging-derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5 T.
    Farrell JA; Landman BA; Jones CK; Smith SA; Prince JL; van Zijl PC; Mori S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):756-67. PubMed ID: 17729339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the systematic errors caused by diffusion gradient inhomogeneity in DTI-computer simulations.
    Borkowski K; Krzyżak AT
    NMR Biomed; 2019 Nov; 32(11):e4130. PubMed ID: 31343807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.