These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1764394)

  • 21. Newsmakers: why we have waited.
    Ashton K
    Nurs Times; 1978 Nov; 74(44):1790. PubMed ID: 251259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speakman - it's good news for nurses - but what happens next?
    Nurs Times; 1979 Jul; 75(26):1114-5. PubMed ID: 257414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. RCM evidence to--the Pay Review Body for nursing and midwifery staffs and the professions allied to medicine 1985.
    Midwives Chron; 1985 Feb; 98(1165):suppl 1-30. PubMed ID: 3844596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gearing up for the next pay review.
    Chudley P
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Aug; (358):1, 11. PubMed ID: 6565990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance pay: reviewing the options.
    Buchan J
    Nurs Stand; 1993 Nov 24-30; 8(10):29. PubMed ID: 8297748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Members vote for peace and pay review promise.
    Chudley P
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1982 Dec; (276):1, 8. PubMed ID: 6984527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nurses's pay: a solid case.
    Sylvester J
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Oct; 4(5):22. PubMed ID: 2511481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The pay struggle - nurse managers' role.
    Rogers B
    Nurs Focus; 1982 Jul; 3(11):1, 20. PubMed ID: 6921559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pay campaign. Working to rules.
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1995 Apr 12-18; 91(15):18. PubMed ID: 7731836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Low wages could endanger care levels: contract pay concerns RCN.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Aug; (361):1. PubMed ID: 6566002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pay campaign. Pay in practice.
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1995 May 3-9; 91(18):20-1. PubMed ID: 7753673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. College evidence calls for 'immediate and significant pay increases'.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Dec; (377):suppl 3. PubMed ID: 6569342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. All at sea on pay?
    Webb J
    Nurs Times; 1987 Jan 14-20; 83(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 3643548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Initial views on pay review body.
    Ellis S
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1983 Jan; (277):1. PubMed ID: 6550405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pay award. Relief--and concern.
    Naish J
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Feb; 3(22):14-5. PubMed ID: 2495458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. People and pay.
    Carlisle D
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Feb; 3(22):13. PubMed ID: 2495457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pay campaign. Striking precedents.
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1995 Mar 22-8; 91(12):20-1. PubMed ID: 7716032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Back to the 80 pound pay target.
    Packham H
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Jun; 148(23):14-6. PubMed ID: 256096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nurses' pay: can't pay, won't pay?
    Gaze H
    Nurs Times; 1986 Jan 29-Feb 4; 82(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 3633546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reviewing the review body.
    Bolger T
    Nurs Times; 1986 Jun 11-18; 82(24):24. PubMed ID: 3636895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.