These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17645162)

  • 1. Source-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory.
    Foley MA; Foley HJ
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Mar; 35(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 17645162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anagram solving: does effort have an effect?
    Foley MA; Foley HJ; Wilder A; Rusche L
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Nov; 17(6):755-8. PubMed ID: 2811672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discovery misattribution: when solving is confused with remembering.
    Dougal S; Schooler JW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Nov; 136(4):577-92. PubMed ID: 17999572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An asymmetry between memory encoding and retrieval. Revelation, generation, and transfer-appropriate processing.
    Mulligan NW; Lozito JP
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 16371137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reinstating effortful encoding operations at test enhances episodic remembering.
    Dewhurst SA; Brandt KR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Apr; 60(4):543-50. PubMed ID: 17455065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can I cut the Gordian tnok? The impact of pronounceability, actual solvability, and length on intuitive problem assessments of anagrams.
    Topolinski S; Bakhtiari G; Erle TM
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():439-52. PubMed ID: 26550802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anticipating partners' responses: examining item and source memory following interactive exchanges.
    Foley MA; Foley HJ; Durley JR; Maitner AT
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1539-47. PubMed ID: 17263077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oxygenation and blood concentration changes in human subject prefrontal activation by anagram solutions.
    Chance B; Nioka S; Sadi S; Li C
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2003; 510():397-401. PubMed ID: 12580461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive effort and recollective experience in recognition memory.
    Dewhurst SA; Hitch GJ
    Memory; 1999 Mar; 7(2):129-46. PubMed ID: 10645376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the encoding-retrieval match in recognition memory: effects of experimental design, specificity, and retention interval.
    Dewhurst SA; Knott LM
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1101-9. PubMed ID: 21156873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hypnotic susceptibility, imaging ability, and anagram-solving activity.
    Wallace B; Allen PA; Propper RE
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1996 Oct; 44(4):324-37. PubMed ID: 8885531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generating anagrams from multiple core strings employing user-defined vocabularies and orthographic parameters.
    Jordan TR; Monteiro A
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 Feb; 35(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 12723788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of source memory in older adults' recollective experience.
    Boywitt CD; Kuhlmann BG; Meiser T
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):484-97. PubMed ID: 21843008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Boundaries of the relation between conscious recollection and source memory for perceptual details.
    Meiser T; Sattler C
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Mar; 16(1):189-210. PubMed ID: 16725348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of cognitive activity and perceptual details on speech source monitoring.
    Sugimori E; Tanno Y
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Nov; 101(Pt 4):777-90. PubMed ID: 20137163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating models of remember-know judgments: complexity, mimicry, and discriminability.
    Cohen AL; Rotello CM; Macmillan NA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Oct; 15(5):906-26. PubMed ID: 18926982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Activating concepts by activating experiential traces: investigations with a series of anagram solution tasks.
    Berndt E; Dudschig C; Kaup B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):483-498. PubMed ID: 27882842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interrupting intentions: Zeigarnik-like effects in prospective memory.
    Mäntylä T; Sgaramella T
    Psychol Res; 1997; 60(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 9342962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychology of computer use: V. Computer use and the experience of time.
    Juhnke R; Scott JN
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Dec; 67(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 3226840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive operations in the generation effect on a recall test: role of aging and divided attention.
    Taconnat L; Isingrini M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):827-37. PubMed ID: 15238027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.