These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17645514)

  • 1. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zheng YL; Zhang H; Shu Y; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2007 Sep; 40(9):707-14. PubMed ID: 17645514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals.
    Veltri M; Mollo A; Mantovani L; Pini P; Balleri P; Grandini S
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):610-6. PubMed ID: 16104974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 24673737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
    Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
    Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
    Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography.
    Özer SY
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 21167759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Hülsmann M; Gressmann G; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2003 May; 36(5):358-66. PubMed ID: 12752650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Centring ability and apical transportation after overinstrumentation with ProTaper Universal and ProFile Vortex instruments.
    González Sánchez JA; Duran-Sindreu F; de Noé S; Mercadé M; Roig M
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):542-51. PubMed ID: 22264187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals.
    Aydin C; Inan U; Yasar S; Bulucu B; Tunca YM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Mar; 105(3):e92-7. PubMed ID: 18280956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
    Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.