280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17645859)
1. [Evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia positive cutting edge after conization].
Dai ZQ; Pan LY; Huang HF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 29(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 17645859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Residual and recurrent lesions after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Milojkovic M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jan; 76(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11818094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cervical pathology: significance and therapeutic impact of margin status].
Michy T; Leveque J; Loussouarn D; Dravet F; Dejode M; Sagan C; Descamps P; Classe JM
Bull Cancer; 2008 Dec; 95(12):1171-5. PubMed ID: 19091650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnosis and treatment of grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by cervical conization in 98 patients].
Chen W; Guan T
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1642-4, 1647. PubMed ID: 20650790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of MR-based radiomics in identifying residual disease in patients with carcinoma in situ after cervical conization.
Song M; Lin J; Song F; Wu D; Qian Z
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19890. PubMed ID: 33199785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of clinical evolution in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) treated by cervical conization.
Cardoso FA; Campaner AB; Silva MA
APMIS; 2014 Mar; 122(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 23763281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years.
Hartman CA; Teixeira JC; Barbosa SB; Figueiredo SM; Andrade LA; Bastos JF
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 27984378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and Long-term Outcomes of Repeated Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone of the Cervix.
van de Sande AJM; Schreuder CM; van Baars R; Koeneman MM; Gerestein CG; Kruse AJ; van Kemenade FJ; Willemsen SP; van Beekhuizen HJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 139(3):417-422. PubMed ID: 35115479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive factors for residual disease in the uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Hamontri S; Israngura N; Rochanawutanon M; Bullangpoti S; Tangtrakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Feb; 93 Suppl 2():S74-80. PubMed ID: 21299083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Conization non in sano].
Lahousen M; Pickel H; Girardi F; Jäger G
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1992; 32 Suppl 1():131. PubMed ID: 1286317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone biopsy and hysterectomy in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jones HW
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Mar; 9(1):221-36. PubMed ID: 7600728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study.
Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated with minimal conization by carbon dioxide laser.
Békássy Z
Lasers Surg Med; 1997; 20(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 9142687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of the follow up results of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III after surgical treatment].
Dai ZQ; Pan LY; Huang HF; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 42(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 17442185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
