296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17646256)
41. Natural selection shapes genome-wide patterns of copy-number polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.
Emerson JJ; Cardoso-Moreira M; Borevitz JO; Long M
Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5883):1629-31. PubMed ID: 18535209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Identifying signatures of selection at the enhancer of split neurogenic gene complex in Drosophila.
Macdonald SJ; Long AD
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):607-19. PubMed ID: 15537803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Estimating the parameters of background selection and selective sweeps in
Campos JL; Zhao L; Charlesworth B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(24):E4762-E4771. PubMed ID: 28559322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Short sequence motifs, overrepresented in mammalian conserved non-coding sequences.
Minovitsky S; Stegmaier P; Kel A; Kondrashov AS; Dubchak I
BMC Genomics; 2007 Oct; 8():378. PubMed ID: 17945028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Rapid genomic changes in Drosophila melanogaster adapting to desiccation stress in an experimental evolution system.
Kang L; Aggarwal DD; Rashkovetsky E; Korol AB; Michalak P
BMC Genomics; 2016 Mar; 17():233. PubMed ID: 26979755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An atlas of over 90,000 conserved noncoding sequences provides insight into crucifer regulatory regions.
Haudry A; Platts AE; Vello E; Hoen DR; Leclercq M; Williamson RJ; Forczek E; Joly-Lopez Z; Steffen JG; Hazzouri KM; Dewar K; Stinchcombe JR; Schoen DJ; Wang X; Schmutz J; Town CD; Edger PP; Pires JC; Schumaker KS; Jarvis DE; Mandáková T; Lysak MA; van den Bergh E; Schranz ME; Harrison PM; Moses AM; Bureau TE; Wright SI; Blanchette M
Nat Genet; 2013 Aug; 45(8):891-8. PubMed ID: 23817568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Lineage-specific conserved noncoding sequences of plant genomes: their possible role in nucleosome positioning.
Hettiarachchi N; Kryukov K; Sumiyama K; Saitou N
Genome Biol Evol; 2014 Sep; 6(9):2527-42. PubMed ID: 25364802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Large-scale turnover of functional transcription factor binding sites in Drosophila.
Moses AM; Pollard DA; Nix DA; Iyer VN; Li XY; Biggin MD; Eisen MB
PLoS Comput Biol; 2006 Oct; 2(10):e130. PubMed ID: 17040121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Divergence of the yellow gene between Drosophila melanogaster and D. subobscura: recombination rate, codon bias and synonymous substitutions.
Munté A; Aguadé M; Segarra C
Genetics; 1997 Sep; 147(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 9286677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Selection, recombination and demographic history in Drosophila miranda.
Bachtrog D; Andolfatto P
Genetics; 2006 Dec; 174(4):2045-59. PubMed ID: 17028331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effects of purifying selection on patterns of genetic differentiation between Drosophila melanogaster populations.
Jackson BC; Campos JL; Zeng K
Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Feb; 114(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 25227256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessing the impact of comparative genomic sequence data on the functional annotation of the Drosophila genome.
Bergman CM; Pfeiffer BD; Rincón-Limas DE; Hoskins RA; Gnirke A; Mungall CJ; Wang AM; Kronmiller B; Pacleb J; Park S; Stapleton M; Wan K; George RA; de Jong PJ; Botas J; Rubin GM; Celniker SE
Genome Biol; 2002; 3(12):RESEARCH0086. PubMed ID: 12537575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Accelerated evolution of conserved noncoding sequences in humans.
Prabhakar S; Noonan JP; Pääbo S; Rubin EM
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5800):786. PubMed ID: 17082449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.
Andolfatto P
Genome Res; 2007 Dec; 17(12):1755-62. PubMed ID: 17989248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Positive and negative selection in murine ultraconserved noncoding elements.
Halligan DL; Oliver F; Guthrie J; Stemshorn KC; Harr B; Keightley PD
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Sep; 28(9):2651-60. PubMed ID: 21478460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Holding it together: rapid evolution and positive selection in the synaptonemal complex of Drosophila.
Hemmer LW; Blumenstiel JP
BMC Evol Biol; 2016 May; 16():91. PubMed ID: 27150275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Population genomic analysis of base composition evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
Poh YP; Ting CT; Fu HW; Langley CH; Begun DJ
Genome Biol Evol; 2012; 4(12):1245-55. PubMed ID: 23160062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Purifying selection in deeply conserved human enhancers is more consistent than in coding sequences.
De Silva DR; Nichols R; Elgar G
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e103357. PubMed ID: 25062004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparative Genomics in Drosophila.
Oti M; Pane A; Sammeth M
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1704():433-450. PubMed ID: 29277877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Molecular Evolution of Drosophila Germline Stem Cell and Neural Stem Cell Regulating Genes.
Choi JY; Aquadro CF
Genome Biol Evol; 2015 Oct; 7(11):3097-114. PubMed ID: 26507797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
