These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data. Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microarray data analysis: a hierarchical T-test to handle heteroscedasticity. de Menezes RX; Boer JM; van Houwelingen HC Appl Bioinformatics; 2004; 3(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 15702953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Profound normalisation challenges remain in the analysis of data from microarray experiments. Lyons-Weiler J Appl Bioinformatics; 2003; 2(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 15130790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A new outlier removal approach for cDNA microarray normalization. Wu Y; Yan L; Liu H; Sun H; Xie H Biotechniques; 2009 Aug; 47(2):691-2, 694-700. PubMed ID: 19737130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Partition resampling and extrapolation averaging: approximation methods for quantifying gene expression in large numbers of short oligonucleotide arrays. Goldstein DR Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2364-72. PubMed ID: 16877752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Most pooling variation in array-based DNA pooling is attributable to array error rather than pool construction error. Macgregor S Eur J Hum Genet; 2007 Apr; 15(4):501-4. PubMed ID: 17264871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A robust neural networks approach for spatial and intensity-dependent normalization of cDNA microarray data. Tarca AL; Cooke JE; Mackay J Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2674-83. PubMed ID: 15797913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of pooling mRNA in microarray class comparisons. Shih JH; Michalowska AM; Dobbin K; Ye Y; Qiu TH; Green JE Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3318-25. PubMed ID: 15247103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rosetta error model for gene expression analysis. Weng L; Dai H; Zhan Y; He Y; Stepaniants SB; Bassett DE Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 22(9):1111-21. PubMed ID: 16522673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments. Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comment on 'Evaluation of the gene-specific dye bias in cDNA microarray experiments'. Dobbin KK; Shih JH; Simon RM Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2803-4. PubMed ID: 15817695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clusterv: a tool for assessing the reliability of clusters discovered in DNA microarray data. Valentini G Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(3):369-70. PubMed ID: 16332708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis. Liu P; Hwang JT Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An ensemble approach to microarray data-based gene prioritization after missing value imputation. Hua D; Lai Y Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 17267438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. To permute or not to permute. Huang Y; Xu H; Calian V; Hsu JC Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2244-8. PubMed ID: 16870938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]