These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17646504)

  • 1. Ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated postoperative cardiac surgery patients.
    Wyffels PA; Durnez PJ; Helderweirt J; Stockman WM; De Kegel D
    Anesth Analg; 2007 Aug; 105(2):448-52. PubMed ID: 17646504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
    Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative value of pressures and volumes in assessing fluid responsiveness after valvular and coronary artery surgery.
    Breukers RM; Trof RJ; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Twisk JW; Jansen JR; Groeneveld J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18835782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Arterial versus plethysmographic dynamic indices to test responsiveness for testing fluid administration in hypotensive patients: a clinical trial.
    Natalini G; Rosano A; Taranto M; Faggian B; Vittorielli E; Bernardini A
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Dec; 103(6):1478-84. PubMed ID: 17122227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in amplitude of central venous pressure curve induced by respiration is a useful tool to reveal fluid responsiveness in postcardiac surgery patients.
    Westphal GA; Silva E; Caldeira Filho M; Roman Gonçalves AR; Poli-de-Figueiredo LF
    Shock; 2006 Aug; 26(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 16878021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.
    Auler JO; Galas F; Hajjar L; Santos L; Carvalho T; Michard F
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Apr; 106(4):1201-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18349193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
    Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.
    Renner J; Gruenewald M; Quaden R; Hanss R; Meybohm P; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):650-8. PubMed ID: 19114894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.
    Geerts BF; Maas J; de Wilde RB; Aarts LP; Jansen JR
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):802-6. PubMed ID: 21799416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index.
    Fischer MO; Pelissier A; Bohadana D; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL; Fellahi JL
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 23992654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.
    Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ability of pleth variability index to predict the hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients under general anesthesia.
    Desebbe O; Boucau C; Farhat F; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Mar; 110(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 20185658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations to optimize patient fluid status.
    Desebbe O; Cannesson M
    Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2008 Dec; 21(6):772-8. PubMed ID: 18997528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Yazigi A; Khoury E; Hlais S; Madi-Jebara S; Haddad F; Hayek G; Jabbour K
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Jun; 26(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 22100211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation for lung surgery using thoracotomy: randomised controlled study.
    Lee JH; Jeon Y; Bahk JH; Gil NS; Hong DM; Kim JH; Kim HJ
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jan; 28(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 21088596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting fluid responsiveness during infrarenal aortic cross-clamping in pigs.
    Biais M; Calderon J; Pernot M; Barandon L; Couffinhal T; Ouattara A; Sztark F
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1101-7. PubMed ID: 24060469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated pre-ejection period variation predicts fluid responsiveness in low tidal volume ventilated pigs.
    Vistisen ST; Koefoed-Nielsen J; Larsson A
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 Feb; 54(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 19681786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
    Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during different loading conditions in a paediatric animal model.
    Renner J; Cavus E; Meybohm P; Gruenewald M; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Boening A; Bein B
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2008 Mar; 52(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 18205899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.