These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17646644)

  • 1. Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction.
    MacCarthy T; Bergman A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jul; 104(31):12801-6. PubMed ID: 17646644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic architecture and the evolution of sex.
    Lohaus R; Burch CL; Azevedo RB
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S142-57. PubMed ID: 20421324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination.
    Charlesworth B
    Genet Res; 1990 Jun; 55(3):199-221. PubMed ID: 2394378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolution can favor antagonistic epistasis.
    Desai MM; Weissman D; Feldman MW
    Genetics; 2007 Oct; 177(2):1001-10. PubMed ID: 17720923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diploidy and the selective advantage for sexual reproduction in unicellular organisms.
    Kleiman M; Tannenbaum E
    Theory Biosci; 2009 Nov; 128(4):249-85. PubMed ID: 19902285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epistasis and the selective advantage of sex and recombination.
    de Oliveira VM; da Silva JK; Campos PR
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):031905. PubMed ID: 18851063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual selection and its effect on the fixation of an asexual clone.
    Salathé M
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):536-8. PubMed ID: 17148282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fixation of mutators in asexual populations: the role of genetic drift and epistasis.
    Jain K; Nagar A
    Evolution; 2013 Apr; 67(4):1143-54. PubMed ID: 23550762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks.
    Azevedo RB; Lohaus R; Srinivasan S; Dang KK; Burch CL
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7080):87-90. PubMed ID: 16511495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of epistasis on the fixation probability of a non-mutator in an adapted asexual population.
    James A
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Oct; 407():225-237. PubMed ID: 27401675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
    Keightley PD; Otto SP
    Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative fitness can decrease in evolving asexual populations of S. cerevisiae.
    Paquin CE; Adams J
    Nature; 1983 Nov 24-30; 306(5941):368-70. PubMed ID: 16752492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experiments with digital organisms on the origin and maintenance of sex in changing environments.
    Misevic D; Ofria C; Lenski RE
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S46-54. PubMed ID: 20200140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hidden epistastic interactions can favour the evolution of sex and recombination.
    Peck JR; Waxman D; Welch JJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e48382. PubMed ID: 23185255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasis.
    Gandon S; Otto SP
    Genetics; 2007 Apr; 175(4):1835-53. PubMed ID: 17277371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection against deleterious mutations and the maintenance of biparental sex.
    Howard RS
    Theor Popul Biol; 1994 Jun; 45(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 8066552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual reproduction reshapes the genetic architecture of digital organisms.
    Misevic D; Ofria C; Lenski RE
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 273(1585):457-64. PubMed ID: 16615213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interlocus sexually antagonistic coevolution can create indirect selection for increased recombination.
    Dapper AL; Lively CM
    Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1216-24. PubMed ID: 24351085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic segregation and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.
    Kirkpatrick M; Jenkins CD
    Nature; 1989 May; 339(6222):300-1. PubMed ID: 2725643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Nonstationary Dynamics of Fitness Distributions: Asexual Model with Epistasis and Standing Variation.
    Martin G; Roques L
    Genetics; 2016 Dec; 204(4):1541-1558. PubMed ID: 27770037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.