377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17647056)
1. Significance of ductal margin status in patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Sasaki R; Takeda Y; Funato O; Nitta H; Kawamura H; Uesugi N; Sugai T; Wakabayashi G; Ohkohchi N
World J Surg; 2007 Sep; 31(9):1788-1796. PubMed ID: 17647056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of ductal resection margin status on long-term survival in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Wakai T; Shirai Y; Moroda T; Yokoyama N; Hatakeyama K
Cancer; 2005 Mar; 103(6):1210-6. PubMed ID: 15685618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Residual Carcinoma In Situ at the Ductal Stump has a Negative Survival Effect: An Analysis of Early-stage Cholangiocarcinomas.
Tsukahara T; Ebata T; Shimoyama Y; Yokoyama Y; Igami T; Sugawara G; Mizuno T; Nagino M
Ann Surg; 2017 Jul; 266(1):126-132. PubMed ID: 27501166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Shiraki T; Kuroda H; Takada A; Nakazato Y; Kubota K; Imai Y
World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Mar; 24(12):1332-1342. PubMed ID: 29599608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinicopathological analysis and prognosis of extrahepatic bile duct cancer with a microscopic positive ductal margin.
Han IW; Jang JY; Lee KB; Kang MJ; Kwon W; Park JW; Chang YR; Kim SW
HPB (Oxford); 2014 Jun; 16(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 24308425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical impact of intraoperative histological examination of the ductal resection margin in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Konishi M; Iwasaki M; Ochiai A; Hasebe T; Ojima H; Yanagisawa A
Br J Surg; 2010 Sep; 97(9):1363-8. PubMed ID: 20632323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of residual in situ carcinoma on postoperative survival in 125 patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma.
Nakanishi Y; Kondo S; Zen Y; Yonemori A; Kubota K; Kawakami H; Tanaka E; Hirano S; Itoh T; Nakanuma Y
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2010 Mar; 17(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 19521656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alteration of p53-binding protein 1 expression as a risk factor for local recurrence in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Wakai T; Shirai Y; Sakata J; Korita PV; Matsuda Y; Takamura M; Ohashi R; Nagahashi M; Ajioka Y; Hatakeyama K
Int J Oncol; 2011 May; 38(5):1227-36. PubMed ID: 21373753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ of the biliary duct margin affect the prognosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis.
Ke Q; Wang B; Lin N; Wang L; Liu J
World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 17(1):211. PubMed ID: 31818290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ of the bile duct margin in patients with surgically resected node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with poor survival: a retrospective study.
Higuchi R; Yazawa T; Uemura S; Izumo W; Furukawa T; Yamamoto M
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2017 Aug; 24(8):456-465. PubMed ID: 28547855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early DNA damage response in residual carcinoma in situ at ductal stumps and local recurrence in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Wakai T; Shirai Y; Sakata J; Korita PV; Ajioka Y; Hatakeyama K
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2013 Mar; 20(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 22886457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection.
Jang JY; Kim SW; Park DJ; Ahn YJ; Yoon YS; Choi MG; Suh KS; Lee KU; Park YH
Ann Surg; 2005 Jan; 241(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 15621994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgery for recurrent biliary carcinoma: results for 27 recurrent cases.
Noji T; Tsuchikawa T; Mizota T; Okamura K; Nakamura T; Tamoto E; Shichinohe T; Hirano S
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():82. PubMed ID: 25884694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term clinical outcome of the surgically resected intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct.
Jung G; Park KM; Lee SS; Yu E; Hong SM; Kim J
J Hepatol; 2012 Oct; 57(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 22634127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When hepatic-side ductal margin is positive in N+ cases, additional resection of the bile duct is not necessary to render the negative hepatic-side ductal margin during surgery for extrahepatic distal bile duct carcinoma.
Iso Y; Kita J; Kato M; Shimoda M; Kubota K
Med Sci Monit; 2014 Mar; 20():471-5. PubMed ID: 24657986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Confinement to the intrapancreatic bile duct is independently associated with a better prognosis in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Ahn KS; Kang KJ; Kang YN; Kim YH; Kim TS
BMC Gastroenterol; 2016 Feb; 16():21. PubMed ID: 26911927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Blumgart preoperative staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of resectability and outcomes in 380 patients.
Matsuo K; Rocha FG; Ito K; D'Angelica MI; Allen PJ; Fong Y; Dematteo RP; Gonen M; Endo I; Jarnagin WR
J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Sep; 215(3):343-55. PubMed ID: 22749003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic relevance of ductal margins in operative resection of bile duct cancer.
Higuchi R; Ota T; Araida T; Kobayashi M; Furukawa T; Yamamoto M
Surgery; 2010 Jul; 148(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 20116818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct: mode of spread and its prognostic implications.
Yamaguchi K; Chijiiwa K; Saiki S; Shimizu S; Takashima M; Tanaka M
Hepatogastroenterology; 1997; 44(17):1256-61. PubMed ID: 9356836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Significance of positive ductal margin and prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct carcinoma].
Liang JW; Zhao P; Zhou ZX; Tian YT; Zhao DB; Wang CF
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 47(9):677-80. PubMed ID: 19615237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
