These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17647096)

  • 1. Primary cesarean deliveries prior to labor in the United States, 1979-2004.
    Joesch JM; Gossman GL; Tanfer K
    Matern Child Health J; 2008 May; 12(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 17647096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the 1980s.
    Placek PJ; Taffel SM
    Am J Public Health; 1988 May; 78(5):512-5. PubMed ID: 3354732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of legislatively imposed practice guidelines on cesarean section rates: the Florida experience.
    Studnicki J; Remmel R; Campbell R; Werner DC
    Am J Med Qual; 1997; 12(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 9116534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the Financial Impact of Reducing Primary Cesareans.
    DeJoy SA; Bohl MG; Mahoney K; Blake C
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2020 Jan; 65(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 31353803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recent patterns in cesarean delivery in the United States.
    Placek PJ; Taffel SM
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1988 Dec; 15(4):607-27. PubMed ID: 3226670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
    Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Beucher G; Deneux-Tharaux C; Deruelle P; Diemunsch P; Gallot D; Haumonté JB; Heimann S; Kayem G; Lopez E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Sellier Y; Rozenberg P; d'Ercole C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.
    Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean.
    Gifford DS; Morton SC; Fiske M; Keesey J; Keeler E; Kahn KL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 95(4):589-95. PubMed ID: 10725495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maternal clinical diagnoses and hospital variation in the risk of cesarean delivery: analyses of a National US Hospital Discharge Database.
    Kozhimannil KB; Arcaya MC; Subramanian SV
    PLoS Med; 2014 Oct; 11(10):e1001745. PubMed ID: 25333943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hospital-ownership status and cesareans in the United States: The effect of for-profit hospitals.
    Morris T; McNamara K; Morton CH
    Birth; 2017 Dec; 44(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 28737270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surveillance of cesarean section deliveries, New Jersey, 1999-2004.
    Denk CE; Kruse LK; Jain NJ
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 16948720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of the HealthChoice program on cesarean section and vaginal birth after C-section deliveries: a retrospective analysis.
    Misra A
    Matern Child Health J; 2008 Mar; 12(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 17549614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. National trends in primary cesarean delivery, labor attempts, and labor success, 1990-2010.
    Simon AE; Uddin SG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):554.e1-8. PubMed ID: 23954531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A national review of cesarean delivery in Ethiopia.
    Fesseha N; Getachew A; Hiluf M; Gebrehiwot Y; Bailey P
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Oct; 115(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 21872239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Racial differences in cesareans: an analysis of U.S. 2001 National Inpatient Sample Data.
    Kabir AA; Pridjian G; Steinmann WC; Herrera EA; Khan MM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):710-8. PubMed ID: 15802395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeat cesareans: how many are elective?
    Gregory KD; Henry OA; Gellens AJ; Hobel CJ; Platt LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):574-8. PubMed ID: 8090395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?
    Lydon-Rochelle MT; Gardella C; Cárdenas V; Easterling TR
    Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.