BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17649908)

  • 1. Temporal change analysis for characterization of mass lesions in mammography.
    Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):945-53. PubMed ID: 17649908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs.
    Timp S; van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2629-38. PubMed ID: 16193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interval change analysis to improve computer aided detection in mammography.
    Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Feb; 10(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 15996893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4451-60. PubMed ID: 19928076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms.
    Filev P; Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 15789598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of normal tissue context in computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms.
    Hupse R; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Dec; 28(12):2033-41. PubMed ID: 19666331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved location features for linkage of regions across ipsilateral mammograms.
    Tanner C; van Schie G; Lesniak JM; Karssemeijer N; Székely G
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1265-72. PubMed ID: 23731758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
    Lauria A
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
    Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammogram-based discriminant fusion analysis for breast cancer diagnosis.
    Li JB; Wang YH; Tang LL
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(6):710-6. PubMed ID: 23153999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Zhou C; Ge J
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4157-68. PubMed ID: 17153394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A registration framework for the comparison of mammogram sequences.
    Marias K; Behrenbruch C; Parbhoo S; Seifalian A; Brady M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Jun; 24(6):782-90. PubMed ID: 15957600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of volumetric features for temporal comparison of mass lesions in full field digital mammograms.
    Bozek J; Kallenberg M; Grgic M; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021902. PubMed ID: 24506623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
    Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.
    Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams GS; Lu AH; Wallace LP; Maitz GS; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3135-43. PubMed ID: 17022205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method to improve visual similarity of breast masses for an interactive computer-aided diagnosis environment.
    Zheng B; Lu A; Hardesty LA; Sumkin JH; Hakim CM; Ganott MA; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 16485416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An ellipse-fitting based method for efficient registration of breast masses on two mammographic views.
    Pu J; Zheng B; Leader JK; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 18383669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views.
    van Engeland S; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3203-12. PubMed ID: 17022213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.