These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17650120)

  • 1. Object-based attention is multisensory: co-activation of an object's representations in ignored sensory modalities.
    Molholm S; Martinez A; Shpaner M; Foxe JJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 26(2):499-509. PubMed ID: 17650120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Staying within the lines: the formation of visuospatial boundaries influences multisensory feature integration.
    Fiebelkorn IC; Foxe JJ; Schwartz TH; Molholm S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1737-43. PubMed ID: 20584177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional capacity for processing concurrent stimuli is larger across sensory modalities than within a modality.
    Talsma D; Doty TJ; Strowd R; Woldorff MG
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Nov; 43(6):541-9. PubMed ID: 17076810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ceponiene R; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():53-68. PubMed ID: 18482717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanisms of feature- and space-based attention: response modulation and baseline increases.
    McMains SA; Fehd HM; Emmanouil TA; Kastner S
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 98(4):2110-21. PubMed ID: 17671104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and auditory alertness: modality-specific and supramodal neural mechanisms and their modulation by nicotine.
    Thiel CM; Fink GR
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 97(4):2758-68. PubMed ID: 17287445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention and audiovisual integration: is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration?
    Talsma D; Doty TJ; Woldorff MG
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Mar; 17(3):679-90. PubMed ID: 16707740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of strongly focused visual attention on the detection of change in an auditory pattern.
    Sculthorpe LD; Collin CA; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1234():78-86. PubMed ID: 18674520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implicit attentional selection of bound visual features.
    Melcher D; Papathomas TV; Vidnyánszky Z
    Neuron; 2005 Jun; 46(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 15924859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional orienting across the sensory modalities.
    Talsma D; Kok A; Slagter HA; Cipriani G
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Feb; 66(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17553604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination.
    Lehmann S; Murray MM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):326-34. PubMed ID: 15993770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.