387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17650195)
1. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.
Casarez EA; Pillai SD; Mott JB; Vargas M; Dean KE; Di Giovanni GD
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed.
Moore DF; Harwood VJ; Ferguson DM; Lukasik J; Hannah P; Getrich M; Brownell M
J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(3):618-28. PubMed ID: 16108804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genotype diversity of Escherichia coli isolates in natural waters determined by PFGE and ERIC-PCR.
Casarez EA; Pillai SD; Di Giovanni GD
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3643-8. PubMed ID: 17475306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of the sources of Escherichia coli in a watershed using carbon-utilization patterns and composite data sets.
Moussa SH; Massengale RD
J Water Health; 2008 Jun; 6(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 18209282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel application of a statistical technique, Random Forests, in a bacterial source tracking study.
Smith A; Sterba-Boatwright B; Mott J
Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(14):4067-76. PubMed ID: 20566209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of ribotyping and antibiotic resistance patterns for identification of host sources of Escherichia coli strains.
Samadpour M; Roberts MC; Kitts C; Mulugeta W; Alfi D
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2005; 40(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 15613004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sourcing faecal pollution: a combination of library-dependent and library-independent methods to identify human faecal pollution in non-sewered catchments.
Ahmed W; Stewart J; Gardner T; Powell D; Brooks P; Sullivan D; Tindale N
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3771-9. PubMed ID: 17482658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods for the differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli clinical isolates from Poland. II. PFGE, ERIC-PCR, PCR-flaA-RFLP and MLST].
Wardak S; Jagielski M
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2009; 61(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 19517816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microbial source tracking in a rural watershed dominated by cattle.
Graves AK; Hagedorn C; Brooks A; Hagedorn RL; Martin E
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3729-39. PubMed ID: 17582454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization and validation of rep-PCR genotypic libraries for microbial source tracking of environmental Escherichia coli isolates.
Lyautey E; Lu Z; Lapen DR; Berkers TE; Edge TA; Topp E
Can J Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 56(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 20130688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of repetitive extragenic palindromic sequence-based PCR with PCR ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in studying the clonality of Clostridium difficile.
Pasanen T; Kotila SM; Horsma J; Virolainen A; Jalava J; Ibrahem S; Antikainen J; Mero S; Tarkka E; Vaara M; Tissari P
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2011 Feb; 17(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 20331683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repetitive element (REP)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of Escherichia coli isolates from recreational waters of southeastern Lake Huron.
Kon T; Weir SC; Howell ET; Lee H; Trevors JT
Can J Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 55(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 19370070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of genotypic-based microbial source tracking methods requiring a host origin database.
Myoda SP; Carson CA; Fuhrmann JJ; Hahm BK; Hartel PG; Yampara-Lquise H; Johnson L; Kuntz RL; Nakatsu CH; Sadowsky MJ; Samadpour M
J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):167-80. PubMed ID: 15382722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sourcing faecal pollution from onsite wastewater treatment systems in surface waters using antibiotic resistance analysis.
Carroll S; Hargreaves M; Goonetilleke A
J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(3):471-82. PubMed ID: 16108788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choice of indicator organism and library size considerations for phenotypic microbial source tracking by FAME profiling.
Duran M; Yurtsever D; Dunaev T
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(10):2659-68. PubMed ID: 19923772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.
Harwood VJ; Wiggins B; Hagedorn C; Ellender RD; Gooch J; Kern J; Samadpour M; Chapman AC; Robinson BJ; Thompson BC
J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 15382721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microbial source tracking by DNA sequence analysis of the Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase gene.
Ivanetich KM; Hsu PH; Wunderlich KM; Messenger E; Walkup WG; Scott TM; Lukasik J; Davis J
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Dec; 67(3):507-26. PubMed ID: 16973226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wildlife identified as major source of Escherichia coli in agriculturally dominated watersheds by BOX A1R-derived genetic fingerprints.
Somarelli JA; Makarewicz JC; Sia R; Simon R
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 16551490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fidelity of bacterial source tracking: Escherichia coli vs Enterococcus spp and minimizing assignment of isolates from nonlibrary sources.
Hassan WM; Ellender RD; Wang SY
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):591-8. PubMed ID: 17241366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation of faecal Escherichia coli from humans and animals by multiple antibiotic resistance analysis.
Vantarakis A; Venieri D; Komninou G; Papapetropoulou M
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2006 Jan; 42(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 16411923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
