These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17650362)

  • 1. Controlling item exposure and test overlap on the fly in computerized adaptive testing.
    Chen SY; Lei PW; Liao WH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):471-92. PubMed ID: 17650362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing.
    Chen SY; Doong SH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):75-91. PubMed ID: 18482476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of methods for controlling maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Abad FJ; Veldkamp BP
    Psicothema; 2009 May; 21(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 19403088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model.
    Davis LL; Dodd BG
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 18180546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating the relationship between item exposure and test overlap: item sharing and item pooling.
    Chen SY; Lei PW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):205-26. PubMed ID: 19545484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model.
    Davis LL; Pastor DA; Dodd BG; Chiang C; Fitzpatrick SJ
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 12700429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Abad FJ
    Span J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 11(2):618-25. PubMed ID: 18988447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs.
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Ponsoda V; Abad FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):493-513. PubMed ID: 17681109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations.
    Leung CK; Chang HH; Hau KT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):239-57. PubMed ID: 16293199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing single-pool and multiple-pool designs regarding test security in computerized testing.
    Zhang J; Chang HH; Yi Q
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):742-52. PubMed ID: 22218817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controlling the Minimum Item Exposure Rate in Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Two-Stage Sympson-Hetter Procedure.
    Chao HY; Chen JH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Nov; 47(7-8):460-477. PubMed ID: 37997579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum information stratification method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Mazuela P; Olea J
    Psicothema; 2006 Feb; 18(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 17296025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Item selection rules in a Computerized Adaptive Test for the assessment of written English].
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Ponsoda V; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2006 Nov; 18(4):828-34. PubMed ID: 17296125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. a-Stratified CAT design with content blocking.
    Yi Q; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):359-78. PubMed ID: 14633340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of altering randomization intervals on precision of measurement and item exposure.
    Muckle T; Bergstrom B; Becker K; Stahl J
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 18480512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing.
    Cheng Y; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):369-83. PubMed ID: 18534047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of receiving the same items on consecutive computer adaptive test administrations.
    O'Neill T; Lunz ME; Thiede K
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):131-51. PubMed ID: 12029175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing.
    Han KCT
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():7. PubMed ID: 29575849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item selection methods with exposure and time control for computerized classification test.
    Huang Y; Ren H; Chen P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):52-68. PubMed ID: 35840353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item exposure control for multidimensional computer adaptive testing under maximum likelihood and expected a posteriori estimation.
    Huebner AR; Wang C; Quinlan K; Seubert L
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1443-1453. PubMed ID: 26487053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.