256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17651227)
1. Comparative evaluation of silver-containing antimicrobial dressings and drugs.
Castellano JJ; Shafii SM; Ko F; Donate G; Wright TE; Mannari RJ; Payne WG; Smith DJ; Robson MC
Int Wound J; 2007 Jun; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17651227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of ACTICOAT antimicrobial barrier dressing.
Yin HQ; Langford R; Burrell RE
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1999; 20(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 10342470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antimicrobial properties of silver-containing wound dressings: a microcalorimetric study.
O'Neill MA; Vine GJ; Beezer AE; Bishop AH; Hadgraft J; Labetoulle C; Walker M; Bowler PG
Int J Pharm; 2003 Sep; 263(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 12954181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biofilms and delayed healing - an in vitro evaluation of silver- and iodine-containing dressings and their effect on bacterial and human cells.
Bourdillon KA; Delury CP; Cullen BM
Int Wound J; 2017 Dec; 14(6):1066-1075. PubMed ID: 28503756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Therapeutic efficacy of three silver dressings in an infected animal model.
Heggers J; Goodheart RE; Washington J; McCoy L; Carino E; Dang T; Edgar P; Maness C; Chinkes D
J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 15640735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [In-vitro efficacy of topical antibiotics on bacteria from burns].
Baars B; Opferkuch W; Müller FE
Fortschr Med; 1980 Mar; 98(11):400-2. PubMed ID: 6768661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial effectiveness and moisture binding properties of wound dressings.
Aramwit P; Muangman P; Namviriyachote N; Srichana T
Int J Mol Sci; 2010 Aug; 11(8):2864-74. PubMed ID: 21152279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the penetration of nanocrystalline silver through various wound dressing mediums: An in vitro study.
Potgieter MD; Meidany P
Burns; 2018 May; 44(3):596-602. PubMed ID: 29290512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antimicrobial activity of silver-containing dressings on wound microorganisms using an in vitro biofilm model.
Percival SL; Bowler PG; Dolman J
Int Wound J; 2007 Jun; 4(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 17651233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antimicrobial efficacy of a novel silver hydrogel dressing compared to two common silver burn wound dressings: Acticoat™ and PolyMem Silver(®).
Boonkaew B; Kempf M; Kimble R; Supaphol P; Cuttle L
Burns; 2014 Feb; 40(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 23790588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensibility assay for topical agents. A new method.
Lorenti AS; Bensadon-Carbonell JM; Benaim F
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1989; 10(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 2501310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of flow cytometry to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against planktonic Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Percival SL; Slone W; Linton S; Okel T; Corum L; Thomas JG
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 21518089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Randomized Controlled Study of Silver-Based Burns Dressing in a Pediatric Emergency Department.
Brown M; Dalziel SR; Herd E; Johnson K; Wong She R; Shepherd M
J Burn Care Res; 2016; 37(4):e340-7. PubMed ID: 26171678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of human acute wound fluid on the antibacterial efficacy of different antiseptic polyurethane foam dressings: An in vitro analysis.
Rembe JD; Fromm-Dornieden C; Böhm J; Stuermer EK
Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Jan; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 29363857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro efficacy of various topical antimicrobial agents in different time periods from contamination to application against 6 multidrug-resistant bacterial strains isolated from burn patients.
Hajská M; Slobodníková L; Hupková H; Koller J
Burns; 2014 Jun; 40(4):713-8. PubMed ID: 24091332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the antimicrobial effects of four silver-containing dressings on three organisms.
Thomas S; McCubbin P
J Wound Care; 2003 Mar; 12(3):101-7. PubMed ID: 12677872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro test of the efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in simulated wound fluid.
Said J; Dodoo CC; Walker M; Parsons D; Stapleton P; Beezer AE; Gaisford S
Int J Pharm; 2014 Feb; 462(1-2):123-8. PubMed ID: 24374221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standardizing an in vitro procedure for the evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of wound dressings and the assessment of three wound dressings.
Tkachenko O; Karas JA
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2012 Jul; 67(7):1697-700. PubMed ID: 22514261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suprathel-acetic acid matrix versus acticoat and aquacel as an antiseptic dressing: an in vitro study.
Ryssel H; Germann G; Riedel K; Reichenberger M; Hellmich S; Kloeters O
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Oct; 65(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 20798627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time-kill Kinetics of a Novel Antimicrobial Silver Wound Gel Against Select Wound Pathogens.
Lee Y; Atchley DH; Proctor CA; Smith FL; Yi S; Loftis CM; Yates KM
Wounds; 2015 Dec; 27(12):336-46. PubMed ID: 27447106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
