141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17651395)
1. Adhesion to medical device materials and biofilm formation capability of some species of enterococci in different physiological states.
Lleo M; Bonato B; Tafi MC; Caburlotto G; Benedetti D; Canepari P
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2007 Sep; 274(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 17651395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro adhesion to human cells by viable but nonculturable Enterococcus faecalis.
Pruzzo C; Tarsi R; Lleò MM; Signoretto C; Zampini M; Colwell RR; Canepari P
Curr Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 45(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 12070687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surface charge influences enterococcal prevalence in mixed-species biofilms.
van Merode AE; Pothoven DC; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; Krom BP
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 May; 102(5):1254-60. PubMed ID: 17448160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival of enterococcal species in aquatic environments.
Lleò MM; Bonato B; Benedetti D; Canepari P
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2005 Oct; 54(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 16332318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inhibition of the resuscitation from the viable but non-culturable state in Enterococcus faecalis.
Lleò MM; Benedetti D; Tafi MC; Signoretto C; Canepari P
Environ Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 9(9):2313-20. PubMed ID: 17686027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biofilm formation capability of Enterococcus faecalis cells in starvation phase and its susceptibility to sodium hypochlorite.
Liu H; Wei X; Ling J; Wang W; Huang X
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):630-5. PubMed ID: 20307735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The physiology and collective recalcitrance of microbial biofilm communities.
Gilbert P; Maira-Litran T; McBain AJ; Rickard AH; Whyte FW
Adv Microb Physiol; 2002; 46():202-56. PubMed ID: 12073654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence and characterization of Enterococcus spp. isolated from Brazilian foods.
Gomes BC; Esteves CT; Palazzo IC; Darini AL; Felis GE; Sechi LA; Franco BD; De Martinis EC
Food Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 25(5):668-75. PubMed ID: 18541165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of tissue fluids on hydrophobicity and adherence of Enterococcus faecalis to dentin.
George S; Kishen A
J Endod; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1421-5. PubMed ID: 18037050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between enterococcal biofilm formation in vitro and medical-device-related infection potential in vivo.
Sandoe JAT; Witherden IR; Cove JH; Heritage J; Wilcox MH
J Med Microbiol; 2003 Jul; 52(Pt 7):547-550. PubMed ID: 12808074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biological changes of Enterococcus faecalis in the viable but nonculturable state.
E J; Jiang YT; Yan PF; Liang JP
Genet Mol Res; 2015 Nov; 14(4):14790-801. PubMed ID: 26600540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of Streptococcus mutans on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation.
Deng DM; Hoogenkamp MA; Exterkate RA; Jiang LM; van der Sluis LW; Ten Cate JM; Crielaard W
J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1249-52. PubMed ID: 19720224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Biofilms and their significance in medical microbiology].
Cernohorská L; Votava M
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 2002 Nov; 51(4):161-4. PubMed ID: 12532903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bacterial biofilms within the clinical setting: what healthcare professionals should know.
Lindsay D; von Holy A
J Hosp Infect; 2006 Dec; 64(4):313-25. PubMed ID: 17046102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The biofilm forming potential of bacterial species in the genus Campylobacter.
Gunther NW; Chen CY
Food Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 26(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19028304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biofilms and their relevance to veterinary medicine.
Clutterbuck AL; Woods EJ; Knottenbelt DC; Clegg PD; Cochrane CA; Percival SL
Vet Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 121(1-2):1-17. PubMed ID: 17276630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glycosaminoglycans mediate invasion and survival of Enterococcus faecalis into macrophages.
Baldassarri L; Bertuccini L; Creti R; Filippini P; Ammendolia MG; Koch S; Huebner J; Orefici G
J Infect Dis; 2005 Apr; 191(8):1253-62. PubMed ID: 15776371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antagonism between Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas fluorescens in planktonic systems and in biofilms.
Simões M; Simoes LC; Pereira MO; Vieira MJ
Biofouling; 2008; 24(5):339-49. PubMed ID: 18576180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Persistence of Enterococcus faecalis in aquatic environments via surface interactions with copepods.
Signoretto C; Burlacchini G; Pruzzo C; Canepari P
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 May; 71(5):2756-61. PubMed ID: 15870369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of antibacterials on biofilms.
Aslam S
Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec; 36(10):S175.e9-11. PubMed ID: 19084156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
