These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17651880)

  • 1. ERP components activated by the "GO!" and "WITHHOLD!" conflict in the random Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    Zordan L; Sarlo M; Stablum F
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Feb; 66(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17651880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurophysiological markers of alert responding during goal-directed behavior: a high-density electrical mapping study.
    Dockree PM; Kelly SP; Robertson IH; Reilly RB; Foxe JJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):587-601. PubMed ID: 16024257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3.
    Verleger R; Paehge T; Kolev V; Yordanova J; Jaśkowski P
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 16837117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two types of action error: electrophysiological evidence for separable inhibitory and sustained attention neural mechanisms producing error on go/no-go tasks.
    O'Connell RG; Dockree PM; Bellgrove MA; Turin A; Ward S; Foxe JJ; Robertson IH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 18476764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
    Jonkman LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task.
    Kok A; Ramautar JR; De Ruiter MB; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 14692996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural correlates of successful and partial inhibitions in children: an ERP study.
    Cragg L; Fox A; Nation K; Reid C; Anderson M
    Dev Psychobiol; 2009 Nov; 51(7):533-43. PubMed ID: 19685486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography.
    Lavric A; Pizzagalli DA; Forstmeier S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2483-8. PubMed ID: 15525290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alpha power and coherence primarily reflect neural activity related to stages of motor response during a continuous monitoring task.
    Moore RA; Gale A; Morris PH; Forrester D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Aug; 69(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 18430481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioural and ERP indices of response inhibition during a Stop-signal task in children with two subtypes of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Oct; 66(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 17604142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vigilance and intrinsic maintenance of alert state: An ERP study.
    Bonnefond A; Doignon-Camus N; Touzalin-Chretien P; Dufour A
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 211(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20346988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limb (hand vs. foot) and response conflict have similar effects on event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded during motor imagery and overt execution.
    Carrillo-de-la-Peña MT; Lastra-Barreira C; Galdo-Alvarez S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Jul; 24(2):635-43. PubMed ID: 16903864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time course of automatic emotion regulation during a facial Go/Nogo task.
    Zhang W; Lu J
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 22200654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anxiety, cognitive self-evaluation and performance: ERP correlates.
    Righi S; Mecacci L; Viggiano MP
    J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Dec; 23(8):1132-8. PubMed ID: 19695828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated.
    Ramautar JR; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):234-52. PubMed ID: 15518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.