202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17651992)
1. Biomechanical comparison of different plating techniques in repair of mandibular angle fractures.
Alkan A; Celebi N; Ozden B; Baş B; Inal S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Dec; 104(6):752-6. PubMed ID: 17651992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of plating techniques for fractures of the mandibular condyle.
Alkan A; Metin M; Muğlali M; Ozden B; Celebi N
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16777278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of a new technique of mandibular angle fractures: biplanar and bicortical superior proximal 3 holes and bicortical inferior plate fixation.
Turgut G; Kayali MU; Soydan AT; Gündüz O; Salman S; Oktar F; Baş L
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):428-32. PubMed ID: 18362721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of malleable noncompression miniplates in mandibular angle fractures: an experimental study.
Esen A; Dolanmaz D; Tüz HH
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 50(5):e65-8. PubMed ID: 22118919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.
Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 16487808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.
Gear AJ; Apasova E; Schmitz JP; Schubert W
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 15883941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques.
Haug RH; Fattahi TT; Goltz M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 59(10):1199-210. PubMed ID: 11573182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of a new design titanium miniplate for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures.
Suer BT; Kocyigit ID; Kaman S; Tuz HH; Tekin U; Atil F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 43(7):841-5. PubMed ID: 24582290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of stability of titanium and absorbable plate and screw fixation for mandibular angle fractures.
Esen A; Ataoğlu H; Gemi L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 18718777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Experimental studies of the biomechanical stability of different miniplate configurations for the mandibular angle].
Schierle HP; Schmelzeisen R; Rahn B
Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1996; 41():166-70. PubMed ID: 8755434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of fixation stability of resorbable versus titanium plate and screws in mandibular angle fractures.
Bayram B; Araz K; Uckan S; Balcik C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1644-8. PubMed ID: 19615576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques for reconstructing atrophic edentulous mandible fractures.
Madsen MJ; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 16487809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hardware removal rates for mandibular angle fractures: comparing the 8-hole strut and champy plates.
Moore E; Bayrak S; Moody M; Key JM; Vural E
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 24(1):163-5. PubMed ID: 23348277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of compressive strength between three different plates for mandibular angle fractures fixation.
Negreiros Lyrio MC; Monnazzi MS; De Moraes M; Hochuli-Vieira E; Nunes Reis JM; Pereira-Filho VA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e277-80. PubMed ID: 24296119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model.
Shetty V; McBrearty D; Fourney M; Caputo AA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Jul; 53(7):791-801; discussion 801-2. PubMed ID: 7595794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing biomechanical strength of repairs for the mandibular angle fracture.
Dichard A; Klotch DW
Laryngoscope; 1994 Feb; 104(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 8302125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fixation of mandibular angle fractures with a 2.0-mm 3-dimensional curved angle strut plate.
Guimond C; Johnson JV; Marchena JM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Feb; 63(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 15690289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical optimization of bone plates used in rigid fixation of mandibular symphysis fractures.
Lovald S; Baack B; Gaball C; Olson G; Hoard A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1833-41. PubMed ID: 20537782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis of mandibular angle fractures.
Kimsal J; Baack B; Candelaria L; Khraishi T; Lovald S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 69(12):3010-4. PubMed ID: 21496988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process.
Wagner A; Krach W; Schicho K; Undt G; Ploder O; Ewers R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Dec; 94(6):678-86. PubMed ID: 12464890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
