These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17652718)

  • 21. Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia.
    Schallhorn SC; Tanzer DJ; Kaupp SE; Brown M; Malady SE
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Apr; 116(4):702-9. PubMed ID: 19344822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Role of flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement for refractive undercorrection.
    Flanagan GW; Binder PS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1129-41. PubMed ID: 16857499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. No forward shifting of posterior corneal surface in eyes undergoing LASIK.
    Nishimura R; Negishi K; Saiki M; Arai H; Shimizu S; Toda I; Tsubota K
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1104-10. PubMed ID: 17239440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.
    Ghadhfan F; Al-Rajhi A; Wagoner MD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2041-8. PubMed ID: 18053901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Re-treatment after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Bragheeth MA; Fares U; Dua HS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Nov; 92(11):1506-10. PubMed ID: 18757469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intracorneal ring segment implantation in corneas with post-laser in situ keratomileusis keratectasia.
    Piñero DP; Alio JL; Uceda-Montanes A; El Kady B; Pascual I
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Sep; 116(9):1665-74. PubMed ID: 19643485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual field changes after laser in situ keratomileusis in myopic eyes.
    Ozdamar A; Küçüksümer Y; Aras C; Akova N; Ustundag C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 May; 30(5):1020-3. PubMed ID: 15130638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The incidence and risk factors for developing dry eye after myopic LASIK.
    De Paiva CS; Chen Z; Koch DD; Hamill MB; Manuel FK; Hassan SS; Wilhelmus KR; Pflugfelder SC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):438-45. PubMed ID: 16490488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Analysis of the dynamic changes of cornea after myopic excimer laser in situ keratomileusis using an Orbscan II topography system].
    Wu XY; Liu SZ; Hu SF; Li CL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 42(9):777-81. PubMed ID: 17173736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outcomes of epi-LASIK for the correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism after more than 1 year.
    Gan D; Zhou X; Dai J; Qu X; Yu Z; Zhou H; Wang X; Chu R
    Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 19052479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Thresholds for interface haze formation after thin-flap femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
    Rocha KM; Kagan R; Smith SD; Krueger RR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 147(6):966-72, 972.e1. PubMed ID: 19327748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Control-matched analysis of laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes in high myopia.
    Kojima T; Hallak JA; Azar DT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 34(4):544-50. PubMed ID: 18361973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Multifactor analysis of the reasons causing undercorrection after laser in situ keratomileusis].
    Liu HQ; Shi JP; Ma CR; Zhang H; Ma XL; Jin Y; Jin XH; Wang HL
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Apr; 24(4):307-9. PubMed ID: 12820952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with moderate or high myopia and compound myopic astigmatism.
    Bababeygy SR; Zoumalan CI; Manche EE
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 18165076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predictive formula for calculating the probability of LASIK enhancement.
    Hu DJ; Feder RS; Basti S; Fung BB; Rademaker AW; Stewart P; Rosenberg MA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 15030825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of a risk factor scoring system for corneal ectasia after LASIK in eyes with normal topography.
    Binder PS; Trattler WB
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 26(4):241-50. PubMed ID: 20166627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Saeed A; O'Doherty M; O'Doherty J; O'Keefe M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1736-41. PubMed ID: 18812126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences between regressive eyes and non-regressive eyes after LASIK for myopia in the time course of corneal changes assessed with the Orbscan.
    Pan Q; Gu YS; Wang J; Sheng Y; Du CX; Huang ZM; Xin SH
    Ophthalmologica; 2004; 218(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 15004497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy results: long-term follow-up.
    Miyai T; Miyata K; Nejima R; Honbo M; Minami K; Amano S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1527-31. PubMed ID: 18721714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intraocular lens power adjustment nomogram after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Diehl JW; Yu F; Olson MD; Moral JN; Miller KM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1587-90. PubMed ID: 19683157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.