BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17653618)

  • 1. Sagittal craniofacial growth evaluated on children dry skulls using V2 and V3 canal openings as references.
    Harnet JC; Lombardi T; Lutz JC; Meyer P; Kahn JL
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2007 Oct; 29(7):589-94. PubMed ID: 17653618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transversal craniofacial growth evaluated on children dry skulls using V2 and V 3 canal openings as references.
    Harnet JC; Lombardi T; Manière-Ezvan A; Chamorey E; Kahn JL
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2013 Nov; 35(9):757-63. PubMed ID: 23625072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construction and validation of the midsagittal reference plane based on the skull base symmetry for three-dimensional cephalometric craniofacial analysis.
    Kim HJ; Kim BC; Kim JG; Zhengguo P; Kang SH; Lee SH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 24469365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human palatal growth evaluated on medieval crania using nerve canal openings as references.
    Sejrsen B; Kjaer I; Jakobsen J
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1996 Apr; 99(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 8779341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric analysis of craniofacial morphology and growth in unrepaired isolated cleft palate patients.
    Xu Y; Yang C; Schreuder WH; Shi J; Shi B; Zheng Q; Wang Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1853-60. PubMed ID: 25169446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.
    Varghese S; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Vikraman B; Chithranjan A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 20395462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Growth in the external cranial base evaluated on human dry skulls, using nerve canal openings as references.
    Sejrsen B; Jakobsen J; Skovgaard LT; Kjaer I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Dec; 55(6):356-64. PubMed ID: 9477028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphometric methods to evaluate craniofacial growth: study in rabbits.
    de Abreu AT; Veeck EB; da Costa NP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 16549434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
    Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability of the cranial and dental phenotype in Williams syndrome.
    Axelsson S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (170):3-67. PubMed ID: 15762376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Craniofacial changes in Icelandic children between 6 and 16 years of age - a longitudinal study.
    Thordarson A; Johannsdottir B; Magnusson TE
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 16230326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomy of greater palatine foramen and canal and pterygopalatine fossa in Thais: considerations for maxillary nerve block.
    Methathrathip D; Apinhasmit W; Chompoopong S; Lertsirithong A; Ariyawatkul T; Sangvichien S
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2005 Dec; 27(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 16228112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
    Muramatsu A; Nawa H; Kimura M; Yoshida K; Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardization of 3-D CT measurements for length and angles by matrix transformation in the 3-D coordinate system.
    Kitaura H; Yonetsu K; Kitamori H; Kobayashi K; Nakamura T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Jul; 37(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 10912713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphometry of the Greater Palatal Canal in Adult Skulls.
    Soto RA; Cáceres F; Vera C
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 26(5):1697-9. PubMed ID: 26079119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Craniofacial asymmetry in development: an anatomical study.
    Rossi M; Ribeiro E; Smith R
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 12940558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Craniofacial computerized tomography analysis of the midface of patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Suri S; Utreja A; Khandelwal N; Mago SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):418-29. PubMed ID: 18774088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional longitudinal changes in craniofacial growth in untreated hemifacial microsomia patients with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Shibazaki-Yorozuya R; Yamada A; Nagata S; Ueda K; Miller AJ; Maki K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):579-94. PubMed ID: 24785922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric superimposition on the occipital condyles as a longitudinal growth assessment reference: I-point and I-curve.
    Standerwick R; Roberts E; Hartsfield J; Babler W; Kanomi R
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2008 Dec; 291(12):1603-10. PubMed ID: 18833570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.