892 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17653683)
1. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration.
Khan UD
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19841968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prostheses: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prostheses.
Panettiere P; Marchetti L; Accorsi D
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(5):482-9. PubMed ID: 17399656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
Riggio E
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane.
Góes JC; Landecker A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12925857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary (3 years) experience with smooth wall silicone gel implants for primary breast augmentation.
Seify H; Sullivan K; Hester TR
Ann Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 54(3):231-5; discussion 235. PubMed ID: 15725819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants.
Sampaio Góes JC
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 19936826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast augmentation in thin women: patient satisfaction with saline-filled implants.
Stokes RB
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 15383883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Augmentation mammaplasty: where should the implant be placed?
Takayanagi S; Nakagawa C; Sugimoto Y
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 15170249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Round gel breast implants or anatomic gel breast implants: which is the best choice?
Cárdenas-Camarena L; Encinas-Brambila J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):743-51. PubMed ID: 19484175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preliminary report on the use of the Spectra™ implant for the correction of hypoplastic breasts with small-volume asymmetry.
Mazzocchi M; Dessy LA; Gagliardi D; Martano A; Scuderi N
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Mar; 65(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 21992938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Histological and immunohistochemical investigations with capsular contracture after breast augmentation with smooth silicone gel implants].
Prantl L; Schreml S; Fichtner-Feigl S; Pöppl N; Roll C; Eisenmann-Klein M; Hofstädter F
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2006 Aug; 38(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 16991042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Tear-drop augmentation mastopexy": a technique to augment superior pole hollow.
Ceydeli A; Freund RM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(6):425-32; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 14994167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Transaxillary dual-plane breast augmentation with endoscope assistant].
Luan J; Mu DL; Mu L; Liu C; Zhang ZQ
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 25(3):175-7. PubMed ID: 19803195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous augmentation and periareolar mastopexy: selecting the correct implant.
Rancati A; Nava M; Tessari L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):33-9; discussion 40-1. PubMed ID: 20043160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.
Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transaxillary dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty: experience with 98 breasts.
Luan J; Mu D; Mu L
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Nov; 62(11):1459-63. PubMed ID: 18838324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
