132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17654333)
21. In silico prediction of mitochondrial toxicity by using GA-CG-SVM approach.
Zhang H; Chen QY; Xiang ML; Ma CY; Huang Q; Yang SY
Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Feb; 23(1):134-40. PubMed ID: 18940245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An evaluation of selected global (Q)SARs/expert systems for the prediction of skin sensitisation potential.
Patlewicz G; Aptula AO; Uriarte E; Roberts DW; Kern PS; Gerberick GF; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Ryan CA; Basketter DA
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(5-6):515-41. PubMed ID: 17654336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction models of human plasma protein binding rate and oral bioavailability derived by using GA-CG-SVM method.
Ma CY; Yang SY; Zhang H; Xiang ML; Huang Q; Wei YQ
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2008 Aug; 47(4-5):677-82. PubMed ID: 18455346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for prediction of sensory irritants (logRD50) of volatile organic chemicals.
Luan F; Ma W; Zhang X; Zhang H; Liu M; Hu Z; Fan BT
Chemosphere; 2006 May; 63(7):1142-53. PubMed ID: 16307788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Classification of the carcinogenicity of N-nitroso compounds based on support vector machines and linear discriminant analysis.
Luan F; Zhang R; Zhao C; Yao X; Liu M; Hu Z; Fan B
Chem Res Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 18(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 15720123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [SVM-based spectral recognition of corn and weeds at seedling stage in fields].
Deng W; Zhang LD; He XK; Mueller J; Zeng AJ; Song JL; Liu YJ; Zhou JZ; Chen J; Wang X
Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2009 Jul; 29(7):1906-10. PubMed ID: 19798969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantitative structure-activity relationship studies of TIBO derivatives using support vector machines.
Darnag R; Schmitzer A; Belmiloud Y; Villemin D; Jarid A; Chait A; Mazouz E; Cherqaoui D
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Apr; 21(3-4):231-46. PubMed ID: 20544549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radius margin bounds for support vector machines with the RBF kernel.
Chung KM; Kao WC; Sun CL; Wang LL; Lin CJ
Neural Comput; 2003 Nov; 15(11):2643-81. PubMed ID: 14577857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. White box radial basis function classifiers with component selection for clinical prediction models.
Van Belle V; Lisboa P
Artif Intell Med; 2014 Jan; 60(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 24262978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantitative structure-property relationship studies on electrochemical degradation of substituted phenols using a support vector machine.
Yuan S; Xiao M; Zheng G; Tian M; Lu X
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):473-81. PubMed ID: 17050187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Three new consensus QSAR models for the prediction of Ames genotoxicity.
Votano JR; Parham M; Hall LH; Kier LB; Oloff S; Tropsha A; Xie Q; Tong W
Mutagenesis; 2004 Sep; 19(5):365-77. PubMed ID: 15388809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis.
Chan K; Lee TW; Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Weinreb RN; Sejnowski TJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):963-74. PubMed ID: 12214886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A novel feature selection approach for biomedical data classification.
Peng Y; Wu Z; Jiang J
J Biomed Inform; 2010 Feb; 43(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 19647098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prediction of P2Y12 antagonists using a novel genetic algorithm-support vector machine coupled approach.
Hao M; Li Y; Wang Y; Zhang S
Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Mar; 690(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 21414436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Classification of raw and roasted Semen Cassiae samples with the use of Fourier transform infrared fingerprints and least squares support vector machines.
Lai Y; Ni Y; Kokot S
Appl Spectrosc; 2010 Jun; 64(6):649-56. PubMed ID: 20537233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Classification of cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitors and noninhibitors by machine learning techniques.
Vasanthanathan P; Taboureau O; Oostenbrink C; Vermeulen NP; Olsen L; Jørgensen FS
Drug Metab Dispos; 2009 Mar; 37(3):658-64. PubMed ID: 19056915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Application and comparison of classification algorithms for recognition of Alzheimer's disease in electrical brain activity (EEG).
Lehmann C; Koenig T; Jelic V; Prichep L; John RE; Wahlund LO; Dodge Y; Dierks T
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Apr; 161(2):342-50. PubMed ID: 17156848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicting human liver microsomal stability with machine learning techniques.
Sakiyama Y; Yuki H; Moriya T; Hattori K; Suzuki M; Shimada K; Honma T
J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Feb; 26(6):907-15. PubMed ID: 17683964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Classification study of skin sensitizers based on support vector machine and linear discriminant analysis.
Ren Y; Liu H; Xue C; Yao X; Liu M; Fan B
Anal Chim Acta; 2006 Jul; 572(2):272-82. PubMed ID: 17723489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. COMPARE: classification of morphological patterns using adaptive regional elements.
Fan Y; Shen D; Gur RC; Gur RE; Davatzikos C
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jan; 26(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 17243588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
