These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17654364)

  • 1. Assessing calibration uncertainty in molecular dating: the assignment of fossils to alternative calibration points.
    Rutschmann F; Eriksson T; Salim KA; Conti E
    Syst Biol; 2007 Aug; 56(4):591-608. PubMed ID: 17654364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing concordance of fossil calibration points in molecular clock studies: an example using turtles.
    Near TJ; Meylan PA; Shaffer HB
    Am Nat; 2005 Feb; 165(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 15729646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fossil calibration of molecular divergence infers a moderate mutation rate and recent radiations for pinus.
    Willyard A; Syring J; Gernandt DS; Liston A; Cronn R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 16997907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A rich fossil record yields calibrated phylogeny for Acanthaceae (Lamiales) and evidence for marked biases in timing and directionality of intercontinental disjunctions.
    Tripp EA; McDade LA
    Syst Biol; 2014 Sep; 63(5):660-84. PubMed ID: 24733412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fossil-calibrated molecular phylogenies reveal that leaf-mining moths radiated millions of years after their host plants.
    Lopez-Vaamonde C; Wikström N; Labandeira C; Godfray HC; Goodman SJ; Cook JM
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1314-26. PubMed ID: 16780532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the impact of calibration on molecular divergence times using a fossil-rich group: the case of Nothofagus (Fagales).
    Sauquet H; Ho SY; Gandolfo MA; Jordan GJ; Wilf P; Cantrill DJ; Bayly MJ; Bromham L; Brown GK; Carpenter RJ; Lee DM; Murphy DJ; Sniderman JM; Udovicic F
    Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):289-313. PubMed ID: 22201158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods for the quantitative comparison of molecular estimates of clade age and the fossil record.
    Clarke JA; Boyd CA
    Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 64(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 25281846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calibration choice, rate smoothing, and the pattern of tetrapod diversification according to the long nuclear gene RAG-1.
    Hugall AF; Foster R; Lee MS
    Syst Biol; 2007 Aug; 56(4):543-63. PubMed ID: 17654361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Four well-constrained calibration points from the vertebrate fossil record for molecular clock estimates.
    Müller J; Reisz RR
    Bioessays; 2005 Oct; 27(10):1069-75. PubMed ID: 16163732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using more than the oldest fossils: dating osmundaceae with three Bayesian clock approaches.
    Grimm GW; Kapli P; Bomfleur B; McLoughlin S; Renner SS
    Syst Biol; 2015 May; 64(3):396-405. PubMed ID: 25503771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simple method for bracketing absolute divergence times on molecular phylogenies using multiple fossil calibration points.
    Marshall CR
    Am Nat; 2008 Jun; 171(6):726-42. PubMed ID: 18462127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainty in the age of fossils and the stratigraphic fit to phylogenies.
    Pol D; Norell MA
    Syst Biol; 2006 Jun; 55(3):512-21. PubMed ID: 16861213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating divergence times in large phylogenetic trees.
    Britton T; Anderson CL; Jacquet D; Lundqvist S; Bremer K
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 17886144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corrected placement of Mus-Rattus fossil calibration forces precision in the molecular tree of rodents.
    Kimura Y; Hawkins MT; McDonough MM; Jacobs LL; Flynn LJ
    Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():14444. PubMed ID: 26411391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating fossil preservation biases in the selection of calibrations for molecular divergence time estimation.
    Dornburg A; Beaulieu JM; Oliver JC; Near TJ
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):519-27. PubMed ID: 21436104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Caveats on the use of fossil calibrations for molecular dating: a comment on Near et al.
    Parham JF; Irmis RB
    Am Nat; 2008 Jan; 171(1):132-6; author reply 137-40. PubMed ID: 18171158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treating fossils as terminal taxa in divergence time estimation reveals ancient vicariance patterns in the palpimanoid spiders.
    Wood HM; Matzke NJ; Gillespie RG; Griswold CE
    Syst Biol; 2013 Mar; 62(2):264-84. PubMed ID: 23192838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Higher-level salamander relationships and divergence dates inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes.
    Zhang P; Wake DB
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Nov; 53(2):492-508. PubMed ID: 19595776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating molecular clock calibrations using Bayesian analyses with soft and hard bounds.
    Sanders KL; Lee MS
    Biol Lett; 2007 Jun; 3(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 17363358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dating placentalia: Morphological clocks fail to close the molecular fossil gap.
    Puttick MN; Thomas GH; Benton MJ
    Evolution; 2016 Apr; 70(4):873-86. PubMed ID: 26990798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.