These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17654534)

  • 1. Potential exposure assessment errors associated with body-worn RF dosimeters.
    Blas J; Lago FA; Fernández P; Lorenzo RM; Abril EJ
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Oct; 28(7):573-6. PubMed ID: 17654534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electromagnetic field measurements using personal exposimeters.
    Knafl U; Lehmann H; Riederer M
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Feb; 29(2):160-2. PubMed ID: 17929265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of occupational exposure to radiofrequency fields and radiation.
    Cooper TG; Allen SG; Blackwell RP; Litchfield I; Mann SM; Pope JM; van Tongeren MJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 15266067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors influencing uncertainty in measurement of electric fields close to the body in personal RF dosimetry.
    Iskra S; McKenzie R; Cosic I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 20123893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. E-field assessment errors associated with RF dosemeters for different angles of arrival.
    Bahillo A; Blas J; Fernández P; Lorenzo RM; Mazuelas S; Abril EJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 18927131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines.
    Bahr A; Bolz T; Hennes C
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 17495652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
    Christ A
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients.
    Glover PM; Bowtell R
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 18184992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.
    Jokela K
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 17495653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of critical situations in the evaluation of human exposure to magnetic fields with complex waveforms.
    Crotti G; Giordano D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):227-30. PubMed ID: 19854853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thermal mechanisms of interaction of radiofrequency energy with biological systems with relevance to exposure guidelines.
    Foster KR; Glaser R
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):609-20. PubMed ID: 17495663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental procedures and statistical results for evaluation of exposure to a radiofrequency electromagnetic field with complex analogue modulation.
    Trinchero S; Benedetto A; Anglesio L; Trinchero D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 15550715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of personal RF electromagnetic field exposure and actual absorption for the general public.
    Joseph W; Vermeeren G; Verloock L; Heredia MM; Martens L
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):317-30. PubMed ID: 18695413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Setup and dosimetry for exposure of human skin in vivo to RF-EMF at 900 MHz.
    Toivonen T; Toivo T; Puranen L; Jokela K
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Apr; 29(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 18044739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of non-sinusoidal, pulsed, or intermittent exposure to low frequency electric and magnetic fields.
    Heinrich H
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 17495654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetric comparison between different quantities for limiting exposure in the RF band: rationale and implications for guidelines.
    Lin JC
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 17495655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exposure measuring techniques for wide band mobile radiocommunications.
    Trinchero S; Benedetto A; Anglesio L; d'Amore G; Trinchero D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 15550716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of finite-difference time-domain resolution and power-loss computation method on SAR values in plane-wave exposure of Zubal phantom.
    Uusitupa TM; Ilvonen SA; Laakso IM; Nikoskinen KI
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):445-52. PubMed ID: 18184998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Considerations concerning the use of counting active personal dosimeters in pulsed fields of ionising radiation.
    Ambrosi P; Borowski M; Iwatschenko M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 139(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 20083488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
    van Rongen E; Saunders RD; van Deventer ET; Repacholi MH
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.