146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17654582)
1. Inversion-recovery-prepared SSFP for cardiac-phase-resolved delayed-enhancement MRI.
Detsky JS; Stainsby JA; Vijayaraghavan R; Graham JJ; Dick AJ; Wright GA
Magn Reson Med; 2007 Aug; 58(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 17654582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicontrast late gadolinium enhancement imaging enables viability and wall motion assessment in a single acquisition with reduced scan times.
Connelly KA; Detsky JS; Graham JJ; Paul G; Vijayaragavan R; Dick AJ; Wright GA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Oct; 30(4):771-7. PubMed ID: 19787723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low dose gadobenate dimeglumine for imaging of chronic myocardial infarction in comparison with standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Bauner KU; Reiser MF; Huber AM
Invest Radiol; 2009 Feb; 44(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 19077911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of SSFP and IR GRE techniques for measurement of total myocardial mass-influence of applied contrast dosage and implication for relative infarct size assessment.
Grothues F; Boenigk H; Ghanem A; Schwerdtfeger A; Bartels D; Alpers S; Tempelmann C; Klein HU
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(3):607-14. PubMed ID: 17365243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Papillary muscle involvement in myocardial infarction: initial results using multicontrast late-enhancement MRI.
Yang Y; Connelly K; Graham JJ; Detsky J; Lee T; Walcarius R; Paul G; Wright GA; Dick AJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 21182141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Myocardial infarction: optimization of inversion times at delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Gupta A; Lee VS; Chung YC; Babb JS; Simonetti OP
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):921-6. PubMed ID: 15516607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic impact of contrast-enhanced CMR early after acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a regional STEMI network: results of the "Herzinfarktverbund Essen".
Bruder O; Breuckmann F; Jensen C; Jochims M; Naber CK; Barkhausen J; Erbel R; Sabin GV;
Herz; 2008 Mar; 33(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 18344033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Myocardial delayed enhancement imaging: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional inversion prepared fast gradient echo and steady state free precession sequences.
Hazirolan T; Ozkan E; Erol M; Bluemke DA; Aytemir K; Oto A; Besim A
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 17555074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single breath-hold assessment of ventricular volumes using 32-channel coil technology and an extracellular contrast agent.
Parish V; Hussain T; Beerbaum P; Greil G; Nagel E; Razavi R; Schaeffter T; Uribe S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Apr; 31(4):838-44. PubMed ID: 20373427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance sequences improve conducting channel delineation prior to ventricular tachycardia ablation.
Andreu D; Ortiz-Pérez JT; Fernández-Armenta J; Guiu E; Acosta J; Prat-González S; De Caralt TM; Perea RJ; Garrido C; Mont L; Brugada J; Berruezo A
Europace; 2015 Jun; 17(6):938-45. PubMed ID: 25616406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determining microvascular obstruction and infarct size with steady-state free precession imaging cardiac MRI.
Wuest W; Lell M; May M; Scharf M; Schlundt C; Achenbach S; Uder M; Schmid A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119788. PubMed ID: 25793609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.
Klumpp B; Fenchel M; Hoevelborn T; Helber U; Scheule A; Claussen C; Miller S
Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 16896300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced viability imaging: improved contrast in myocardial delayed enhancement using dual inversion time subtraction.
Foo TK; Wolff SD; Gupta SN; Kraitchman DL
Magn Reson Med; 2005 Jun; 53(6):1484-9. PubMed ID: 15906286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cine delayed-enhancement MR imaging of the heart: initial experience.
Setser RM; Kim JK; Chung YC; Chen K; Stillman AE; Loeffler R; Simonetti OP; Weaver JA; Lieber ML; White RD
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):856-62. PubMed ID: 16641338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging shows fatty deposition after myocardial infarction.
Goldfarb JW; Arnold S; Roth M; Han J
Magn Reson Med; 2007 May; 57(5):828-34. PubMed ID: 17457862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the extent of delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with and without phase-sensitive reconstruction at 3.0 T.
Cochet A; Lalande A; Walker PM; Boichot C; Ciappuccini R; Cottin Y; Wolf JE; Brunotte F
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):372-6. PubMed ID: 17507807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Myocardial delayed enhancement imaging using inversion recovery single-shot steady-state free precession: initial experience.
Li W; Li BS; Polzin JA; Mai VM; Prasad PV; Edelman RR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Aug; 20(2):327-30. PubMed ID: 15269961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phase-sensitive inversion-recovery MR imaging in the detection of myocardial infarction.
Huber AM; Schoenberg SO; Hayes C; Spannagl B; Engelmann MG; Franz WM; Reiser MF
Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):854-60. PubMed ID: 16304107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Myocardial viability: rapid assessment with delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging with three-dimensional inversion-recovery prepared pulse sequence.
Kühl HP; Papavasiliu TS; Beek AM; Hofman MB; Heusen NS; van Rossum AC
Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):576-82. PubMed ID: 14688401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image quality and myocardial scar size determined with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: a comparison of two imaging protocols.
Rosendahl L; Ahlander BM; Björklund PG; Blomstrand P; Brudin L; Engvall JE
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2010 Mar; 30(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 20041907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
