BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17654894)

  • 1. Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors.
    Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1918-25. PubMed ID: 17654894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photon counting computed tomography: concept and initial results.
    Shikhaliev PM; Xu T; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):427-36. PubMed ID: 15789589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Jesneck JL; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):588-99. PubMed ID: 15789606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physical characteristics of GE Senographe Essential and DS digital mammography detectors.
    Ghetti C; Borrini A; Ortenzia O; Rossi R; Ordóñez PL
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 18383665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scanning-slit photon counting x-ray imaging system using a microchannel plate detector.
    Shikhaliev PM; Xu T; Le H; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1061-71. PubMed ID: 15191293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
    Elbakri IA; Tesic MM; Xiong Q
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Guntern D; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):906-14. PubMed ID: 17441236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scatter rejection in multislit digital mammography.
    Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):933-40. PubMed ID: 16696469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
    Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Ferrari P; Tassoni D
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-resolution imager for digital mammography: physical characterization of a prototype sensor.
    Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Onishi SK
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3957-69. PubMed ID: 16177523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study of DQE dependence with beam quality on GE essential mammography flat panel.
    García-Mollá R; Linares R; Ayala R
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3176. PubMed ID: 21330969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography.
    Lazzari B; Belli G; Gori C; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2730-43. PubMed ID: 17821981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements.
    Cremers F; Frenzel T; Kausch C; Albers D; Schönborn T; Schmidt R
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):985-96. PubMed ID: 15191282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.