These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. An independent analysis of flexible cystoscope repairs and cost. Canales BK; Gleason JM; Hicks N; Monga M J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):2098-101; discussion 2102. PubMed ID: 17869288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physical properties of flexible ureteroscopes: implications for clinical practice. Monga M; Anderson KJ; Durfee W J Endourol; 2004 Jun; 18(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 15253821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. Boylu U; Oommen M; Thomas R; Lee BR J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2347-51. PubMed ID: 19758626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice. Kramolowsky E; McDowell Z; Moore B; Booth B; Wood N J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 26542761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical technique to achieve high durability of flexible ureteroscopes: A single hospital experience. Lin CC; Wu LS; Huang SS; Lin CF; Chen WH; Wu CT Biomed J; 2018 Dec; 41(6):385-390. PubMed ID: 30709581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The digital flexible ureteroscope: in vitro assessment of optical characteristics. Zilberman DE; Lipkin ME; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Mancini JG; Raymundo ME; Zhong P; Preminger GM J Endourol; 2011 Mar; 25(3):519-22. PubMed ID: 21361823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. Monga M; Best S; Venkatesh R; Ames C; Lee C; Kuskowski M; Schwartz S; Vanlangendock R; Skenazy J; Landman J J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 16753388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The "Body Mass Index" of Flexible Ureteroscopes. Proietti S; Somani B; Sofer M; Pietropaolo A; Rosso M; Saitta G; Gaboardi F; Traxer O; Giusti G J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1090-1095. PubMed ID: 28835120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. Afane JS; Olweny EO; Bercowsky E; Sundaram CP; Dunn MD; Shalhav AL; McDougall EM; Clayman RV J Urol; 2000 Oct; 164(4):1164-8. PubMed ID: 10992358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage. Sung JC; Springhart WP; Marguet CG; L'Esperance JO; Tan YH; Albala DM; Preminger GM Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 16286103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis. Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Novel Flexible Ureteroscope with Omnidirectional Bending Tip Using Joystick-Type Control Unit (URF-Y0016): Initial Validation Study in Bench Models. Tambo M; Inoue T; Miura H; Matsuzaki J; Nutahara K; Hamamoto S; Okada S; Fukuhara H; Fujisawa M; Matsuda T J Endourol; 2020 Jun; 34(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 31984760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Flexible Digital Ureteroscopes: ACMI/Olympus Invisio DUR-D and Olympus URF-V. Shah K; Monga M; Knudsen B Urology; 2015 Jun; 85(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 25711157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics. Abdelshehid C; Ahlering MT; Chou D; Park HK; Basillote J; Lee D; Kim I; Eichel L; Protsenko D; Wong B; McDougall E; Clayman RV J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2017-21. PubMed ID: 15879808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation. Dragos LB; Somani BK; Sener ET; Buttice S; Proietti S; Ploumidis A; Iacoboaie CT; Doizi S; Traxer O J Endourol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):630-637. PubMed ID: 28478744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrarenal manipulation of flexible ureteroscopes: a comparative study. Monga M; Weiland D; Pedro RN; Lynch AC; Anderson K BJU Int; 2007 Jul; 100(1):157-9. PubMed ID: 17552963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes. Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center. Carey RI; Gomez CS; Maurici G; Lynne CM; Leveillee RJ; Bird VG J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):607-10; discussion 610. PubMed ID: 16813899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes. Karaolides T; Bach C; Kachrilas S; Goyal A; Masood J; Buchholz N Urology; 2013 Apr; 81(4):717-22. PubMed ID: 23465156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]