These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17657736)

  • 1. Is volume the most important predictor of outcome in cancer management?
    Greene FL
    J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 97(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 17657736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Key to finding quality cancer hospitals and surgeons is finding out how much they practice.
    Beckman M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jan; 100(2):86-7, 91. PubMed ID: 18182610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competition no obstacle in a new cancer project created by consortium.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 2001 Jun; 8(6):61-5. PubMed ID: 11474946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emerging importance of certification: Volume, outcomes, and regionalization of care.
    Frencher SK; Ryoo JJ; Ko CY
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 99(3):131-2. PubMed ID: 18985682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volume- or outcome-based referral to improve quality of care for esophageal cancer surgery in The Netherlands.
    Wouters MW; Krijnen P; Le Cessie S; Gooiker GA; Guicherit OR; Marinelli AW; Kievit J; Tollenaar RA
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):481-7. PubMed ID: 19466737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cancer care in the pediatric surgical patient: a matter of interpretation.
    Goldin AB; Gow KW
    Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):528; author reply 528-9. PubMed ID: 19715820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome--more than just operative mortality.
    Brennan MF; Radzyner M; Rubin DM
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):470-7. PubMed ID: 19466735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality pancreatic cancer care: it's still mostly about volume.
    Brennan MF
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jun; 101(12):837-8. PubMed ID: 19509363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding surgeon performance and improving patient outcomes.
    Birkmeyer JD
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 Jul; 22(14):2765-6. PubMed ID: 15199085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk-based selective referral for cancer surgery: a potential strategy to improve perioperative outcomes.
    Bilimoria KY; Bentrem DJ; Talamonti MS; Stewart AK; Winchester DP; Ko CY
    Ann Surg; 2010 Apr; 251(4):708-16. PubMed ID: 19898231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The COC (Commission on Cancer): its roots and destiny.
    Brennan MF; Clive RE; Winchester DP
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1994 Jun; 79(6):14-21. PubMed ID: 10134118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Invited commentary: Measurement of quality in surgery: that's our job.
    Bass BL
    Surgery; 2004 Jun; 135(6):576-8. PubMed ID: 15179362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring what we value: quantifying the impact of the physician extender in surgical care.
    Berger J; D'Cunha J
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012; 24(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 22920521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is there a role for the surgeon in today's cancer management?
    Murphy GP
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1995 Mar; 80(3):23-9, 42. PubMed ID: 10140621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using the NCDB for cancer care improvement: an introduction to available quality assessment tools.
    Raval MV; Bilimoria KY; Stewart AK; Bentrem DJ; Ko CY
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):488-90. PubMed ID: 19466738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base.
    Bilimoria KY; Bentrem DJ; Stewart AK; Winchester DP; Ko CY
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Sep; 27(25):4177-81. PubMed ID: 19636004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?
    Birkmeyer JD; Dimick JB; Birkmeyer NJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Apr; 198(4):626-32. PubMed ID: 15051016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving surgical outcomes for cancer in the United States.
    Chang AE
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 95(2):91-2. PubMed ID: 17262738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers: quality improvement through interdisciplinary evaluation and management.
    Winchester DP; Kaufman C; Anderson B; El-Tamer M; Kurtzman SH; Masood S; Kim P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2008 Oct; 93(10):13-7. PubMed ID: 19469362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does volume help predict outcome in surgical disease?
    Khuri SF; Hussaini BE; Kumbhani DJ; Healey NA; Henderson WG
    Adv Surg; 2005; 39():379-453. PubMed ID: 16250562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.