263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17659546)
1. Design, construction and evaluation of an anthropomorphic head phantom with realistic susceptibility artifacts.
Shmueli K; Thomas DL; Ordidge RJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(1):202-7. PubMed ID: 17659546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accurate and sensitive measurements of magnetic susceptibility using echo planar imaging.
Carlsson A; Starck G; Ljungberg M; Ekholm S; Forssell-Aronsson E
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(9):1179-85. PubMed ID: 17071340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EPI image reconstruction with correction of distortion and signal losses.
Liu G; Ogawa S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(3):683-9. PubMed ID: 16892198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute brain ischemia at 3 T: current possibilities and future perspectives comparing conventional echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging and fast spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging sequences using BLADE (PROPELLER).
Fries P; Runge VM; Kirchin MA; Stemmer A; Naul LG; Wiliams KD; Reith W; Bücker A; Schneider G
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 19363447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Susceptibility-matched envelope for the correction of EPI artifacts.
Neufeld A; Assaf Y; Graif M; Hendler T; Navon G
Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Nov; 23(9):947-51. PubMed ID: 16310110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of small rotations on R2* measured with echo planar imaging.
Caparelli EC; Tomasi D; Ernst T
Neuroimage; 2005 Feb; 24(4):1164-9. PubMed ID: 15670694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Macroscopic susceptibility in ultra high field MRI.
Abduljalil AM; Robitaille PM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(6):832-41. PubMed ID: 10589555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo animal functional MRI: improved image quality with a body-adapted mold.
Landuyt W; Sunaert S; Farina D; Meijerink M; Béatse E; Van Hecke P; Hermans R; Marchal G; Lambin P; Bosmans H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Aug; 16(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 12203772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of hemorrhagic hypointense foci in the brain on susceptibility-weighted imaging clinical and phantom studies.
Akter M; Hirai T; Hiai Y; Kitajima M; Komi M; Murakami R; Fukuoka H; Sasao A; Toya R; Haacke EM; Takahashi M; Hirano T; Kai Y; Morioka M; Hamasaki K; Kuratsu J; Yamashita Y
Acad Radiol; 2007 Sep; 14(9):1011-9. PubMed ID: 17707307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of k-space energy spectrum analysis to susceptibility field mapping and distortion correction in gradient-echo EPI.
Chen NK; Oshio K; Panych LP
Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):609-22. PubMed ID: 16480898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic correction of echo-planar imaging (EPI) ghosting artifacts in real-time interactive cardiac MRI using sensitivity encoding.
Kim YC; Nielsen JF; Nayak KS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):239-45. PubMed ID: 18050332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artifact reduction of susceptibility-weighted imaging using a short-echo phase mask.
Ishimori Y; Monma M; Kohno Y
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):1027-34. PubMed ID: 19863413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different techniques for stereotactic positron emission tomography imaging.
Novotny J; Nechvil K; Ptacek J; Novotny J; Liscak R
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2008; 86(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 17881886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A MnCl2-based MR signal intensity linear response phantom.
Kurmis AP; Barber C; Slavotinek JP; Fazzalari NL
Radiol Technol; 2007; 79(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 18032749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Reducing MRI artefacts by controlled combinations of para- and diamagnetic materials].
Anders E
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2():750-3. PubMed ID: 12465293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.
Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correction of concomitant gradient artifacts in experimental microtesla MRI.
Myers WR; Mössle M; Clarke J
J Magn Reson; 2005 Dec; 177(2):274-84. PubMed ID: 16169266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Localization of puncture needles in MRI: experimental studies on precision using spin-echo sequences at 1.0 T].
Langen HJ; Kugel H; Heindel W; Krahe T; Gieseke J; Lackner K
Rofo; 1997 Nov; 167(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 9440897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radio frequency versus susceptibility effects of small conductive implants--a systematic MRI study on aneurysm clips at 1.5 and 3 T.
Lauer UA; Graf H; Berger A; Claussen CD; Schick F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 15919602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
