BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17659966)

  • 1. Necessity of cycloplegia for assessing refractive error in 12-year-old children: a population-based study.
    Fotedar R; Rochtchina E; Morgan I; Wang JJ; Mitchell P; Rose KA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Aug; 144(2):307-9. PubMed ID: 17659966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.
    Choong YF; Chen AH; Goh PP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 16815252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Refractive error and visual impairment in school children in rural southern China.
    He M; Huang W; Zheng Y; Huang L; Ellwein LB
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Feb; 114(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 17123622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethnic differences in refraction and ocular biometry in a population-based sample of 11-15-year-old Australian children.
    Ip JM; Huynh SC; Robaei D; Kifley A; Rose KA; Morgan IG; Wang JJ; Mitchell P
    Eye (Lond); 2008 May; 22(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 17277756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of noncycloplegic refraction in the assessment of refractive errors: the Tehran Eye Study.
    Fotouhi A; Morgan IG; Iribarren R; Khabazkhoob M; Hashemi H
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 90(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 20977697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Refractive error and visual impairment in school-age children in Gombak District, Malaysia.
    Goh PP; Abqariyah Y; Pokharel GP; Ellwein LB
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Apr; 112(4):678-85. PubMed ID: 15808262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Research of cyclopentolate 1% on the effect of cycloplegia for Chinese hyperopic children].
    Wang XM; Ma LX; Wang LH
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 47(11):989-94. PubMed ID: 22336064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correctable and non-correctable visual impairment in a population-based sample of 12-year-old Australian children.
    Robaei D; Huynh SC; Kifley A; Mitchell P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 16815258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of cycloplegia on the refractive status of children: the Shandong children eye study.
    Hu YY; Wu JF; Lu TL; Wu H; Sun W; Wang XR; Bi HS; Jonas JB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117482. PubMed ID: 25658329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of cycloplegic agents: results of a randomized controlled trial in nigerian children.
    Ebri A; Kuper H; Wedner S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1025-31. PubMed ID: 17325142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in categorizing refractive error data in children.
    Sankaridurg P; He X; Naduvilath T; Lv M; Ho A; Smith E; Erickson P; Zhu J; Zou H; Xu X
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 95(7):e633-e640. PubMed ID: 29110438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Refractive error and patterns of spectacle use in 12-year-old Australian children.
    Robaei D; Kifley A; Rose KA; Mitchell P
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1567-73. PubMed ID: 16857261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Post-cycloplegia myopic shift in an older population.
    Toh T; Kearns LS; Scotter LW; Mackey DA
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 12(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 16036481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Higher-order aberrations in children.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M; Soeldner H
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 141(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 16386978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is the appropriate age cut-off for cycloplegia in refraction?
    Sanfilippo PG; Chu BS; Bigault O; Kearns LS; Boon MY; Young TL; Hammond CJ; Hewitt AW; Mackey DA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 92(6):e458-62. PubMed ID: 24641244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of cycloplegia on measurement of the ocular components.
    Mutti DO; Zadnik K; Egashira S; Kish L; Twelker JD; Adams AJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Feb; 35(2):515-27. PubMed ID: 8113002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children.
    Lin Z; Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ; Zhou HJ; Mao GY; Wang NL; Liang YB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 28503812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PowerRefractor versus Canon R-50 Autorefraction to assess refractive error in children: a community-based study in ecuador.
    Virgili G; Angi M; Heede S; Rodriguez D; Bottega E; Molinari A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Feb; 84(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17299345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of tropicamide and cyclopentolate for cycloplegic refractions in myopic adult refractive surgery patients.
    Hofmeister EM; Kaupp SE; Schallhorn SC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Apr; 31(4):694-700. PubMed ID: 15899444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spherical equivalent refractive error in preschool children from a population with a high prevalence of astigmatism.
    Dobson V; Harvey EM; Miller JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Feb; 84(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 17299342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.