183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17660206)
1. Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis.
Huang J; Gusnanto A; O'Sullivan K; Staaf J; Borg A; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2463-9. PubMed ID: 17660206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A fast and flexible method for the segmentation of aCGH data.
Ben-Yaacov E; Eldar YC
Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i139-45. PubMed ID: 18689815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrating copy number polymorphisms into array CGH analysis using a robust HMM.
Shah SP; Xuan X; DeLeeuw RJ; Khojasteh M; Lam WL; Ng R; Murphy KP
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e431-9. PubMed ID: 16873504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data.
Venkatraman ES; Olshen AB
Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 17234643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of array CGH data for cancer studies using fused quantile regression.
Li Y; Zhu J
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2470-6. PubMed ID: 17644559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A segmentation/clustering model for the analysis of array CGH data.
Picard F; Robin S; Lebarbier E; Daudin JJ
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):758-66. PubMed ID: 17825008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of probe coverage for high-resolution oligonucleotide aCGH.
Lipson D; Yakhini Z; Aumann Y
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e77-83. PubMed ID: 17237109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling recurrent DNA copy number alterations in array CGH data.
Shah SP; Lam WL; Ng RT; Murphy KP
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i450-8. PubMed ID: 17646330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stochastic segmentation models for array-based comparative genomic hybridization data analysis.
Lai TL; Xing H; Zhang N
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):290-307. PubMed ID: 17855472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of gene copy number changes in CGH microarrays using a spatially correlated mixture model.
Broët P; Richardson S
Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):911-8. PubMed ID: 16455750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CGHcall: calling aberrations for array CGH tumor profiles.
van de Wiel MA; Kim KI; Vosse SJ; van Wieringen WN; Wilting SM; Ylstra B
Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 23(7):892-4. PubMed ID: 17267432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses.
Willenbrock H; Fridlyand J
Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4084-91. PubMed ID: 16159913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of DNA copy number alterations using penalized least squares regression.
Huang T; Wu B; Lizardi P; Zhao H
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3811-7. PubMed ID: 16131523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BioHMM: a heterogeneous hidden Markov model for segmenting array CGH data.
Marioni JC; Thorne NP; Tavaré S
Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 22(9):1144-6. PubMed ID: 16533818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Classification of array CGH data using smoothed logistic regression model.
Huang J; Salim A; Lei K; O'Sullivan K; Pawitan Y
Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(30):3798-810. PubMed ID: 19856275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Continuous-index hidden Markov modelling of array CGH copy number data.
Stjernqvist S; Rydén T; Sköld M; Staaf J
Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 23(8):1006-14. PubMed ID: 17309894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Segmentation and intensity estimation of microarray images using a gamma-t mixture model.
Baek J; Son YS; McLachlan GJ
Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 17166856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A very fast and accurate method for calling aberrations in array-CGH data.
Benelli M; Marseglia G; Nannetti G; Paravidino R; Zara F; Bricarelli FD; Torricelli F; Magi A
Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):515-8. PubMed ID: 20207682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microarray comparative genomic hybridization reveals genome-wide patterns of DNA gains and losses in post-Chernobyl thyroid cancer.
Kimmel RR; Zhao LP; Nguyen D; Lee S; Aronszajn M; Cheng C; Troshin VP; Abrosimov A; Delrow J; Tuttle RM; Tsyb AF; Kopecky KJ; Davis S; Neiman PE
Radiat Res; 2006 Sep; 166(3):519-31. PubMed ID: 16953671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
