These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1766039)

  • 1. Sonographic measurement of abdominal aortic diameter: interobserver variability.
    Yucel EK; Fillmore DJ; Knox TA; Waltman AC
    J Ultrasound Med; 1991 Dec; 10(12):681-3. PubMed ID: 1766039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in observer variability of ultrasound measurements of the proximal and distal abdominal aorta.
    Pleumeekers HJ; Hoes AW; Mulder PG; van der Does E; Hofman A; Laméris JS; Grobbee DE
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 9718530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sonographic surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms: what is the smallest change in measured diameter that reliably reflects aneurysm growth?
    Schmidt MH; Mitchell JR; Downey DB
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Aug; 50(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 10459310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limitations of ultrasonography in surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Ellis M; Powell JT; Greenhalgh RM
    Br J Surg; 1991 May; 78(5):614-6. PubMed ID: 2059819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra- and interobserver variability in the measurements of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter with computed tomography. The Tromsø study.
    Singh K; Jacobsen BK; Solberg S; Bønaa KH; Kumar S; Bajic R; Arnesen E
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2003 May; 25(5):399-407. PubMed ID: 12713777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abdominal aortic aneurysm as an incidental finding in abdominal ultrasonography.
    Akkersdijk GJ; Puylaert JB; de Vries AC
    Br J Surg; 1991 Oct; 78(10):1261-3. PubMed ID: 1959002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interobserver variability in measuring the dimensions of the abdominal aorta: comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography.
    Jaakkola P; Hippeläinen M; Farin P; Rytkönen H; Kainulainen S; Partanen K
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1996 Aug; 12(2):230-7. PubMed ID: 8760988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abdominal aortic aneurysm measurements for endovascular repair: intra- and interobserver variability of CT measurements.
    Aarts NJ; Schurink GW; Schultze Kool LJ; Bode PJ; van Baalen JM; Hermans J; van Bockel JH
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1999 Dec; 18(6):475-80. PubMed ID: 10637142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of ultrasound measurement of the abdominal aorta.
    Beales L; Wolstenhulme S; Evans JA; West R; Scott DJ
    Br J Surg; 2011 Nov; 98(11):1517-25. PubMed ID: 21861264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated software supported versus manual aorto-iliac diameter measurements in CT angiography of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: assessment of inter- and intraobserver variation.
    Diehm N; Baumgartner I; Silvestro A; Herrmann P; Triller J; Schmidli J; Do DD; Dinkel HP
    Vasa; 2005 Nov; 34(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16363281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intra- and interobserver variability in ultrasound measurements of abdominal aortic diameter. The Tromsø Study.
    Singh K; Bønaa KH; Solberg S; Sørlie DG; Bjørk L
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1998 Jun; 15(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 9659884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distribution of aortic diameter in a screened male population.
    Lucarotti ME; Shaw E; Heather BP
    Br J Surg; 1992 Jul; 79(7):641-2. PubMed ID: 1643472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of the measurement of the infrarenal aortic diameter by ultrasound.
    Wilmink AB; Hubbard CS; Quick CR
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 9200064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonic measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall compliance: a reproducibility study.
    Wilson KA; Hoskins PR; Lee AJ; Fowkes FG; Ruckley CV; Bradbury AW
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Mar; 31(3):507-13. PubMed ID: 10709064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The difference between ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) measurements of aortic diameter increases with aortic diameter: analysis of axial images of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter in normal and aneurysmal aortas. The Tromsø Study, 1994-1995.
    Singh K; Jacobsen BK; Solberg S; Kumar S; Arnesen E
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Aug; 28(2):158-67. PubMed ID: 15234697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnosis of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta].
    Mitacz K; Lakatos F; Sláviková E
    Cesk Radiol; 1990 Sep; 44(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 2249306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Buxton B; Buttery B; Buckley J
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1978 Aug; 48(4):387-9. PubMed ID: 282869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of ultrasound in a screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Thomas PR; Shaw JC; Ashton HA; Kay DN; Scott RA
    J Med Screen; 1994 Jan; 1(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8790479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of aortic geometries created by magnetic resonance imaging data in healthy volunteers.
    Modin D; Renner J; Gårdhagen R; Ebbers T; Länne T; Karlsson M
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Nov; 31(6):485-91. PubMed ID: 21981461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Aneurysm of the abdominal aorta. Diagnostic evaluation of axial computed tomography, echography and arteriography. Study of 8 patients].
    Carbo J; Mearín F; Rodríguez S; Lima A; Pajares García JM
    Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig; 1985 Oct; 68(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 3909262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.