These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17660644)

  • 1. A comparison of impact strength of fragment-bonded anterior teeth using three different restorative materials: an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Kurthukoti AJ; Kayalvizhi G
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2007; 25(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 17660644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the fracture resistance of reattached incisor tooth fragments using 4 different materials.
    Singhal R; Pathak A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 23514683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro study comparing fracture strength recovery of teeth restored with three esthetic bonding materials using different techniques.
    Rajput A; Ataide I; Lambor R; Monteiro J; Tar M; Wadhawan N
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2010; 5(4):398-411. PubMed ID: 21069110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact strength of teeth restored by fragment-bonding.
    Farik B; Munksgaard EC; Andreasen JO
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 2000 Aug; 16(4):151-3. PubMed ID: 11202874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
    Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength.
    Bruschi-Alonso RC; Alonso RC; Correr GM; Alves MC; Lewgoy HR; Sinhoreti MA; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Aug; 26(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 20662884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of a hybrid light-cured glass-ionomer base and liner vs. a light-cured resin tooth fragment attachment.
    Dean JA; Minutillo AL; Moore BK
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 9524973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture strength of fragment-bonded teeth. Effect of calcium hydroxide lining before bonding.
    Farik B; Munksgaard EC; Andreasen JO
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11764835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental evaluation of two methodologies for the restoration of crown fracture in permanent anterior teeth.
    Stellini E; De Francesco M; Sivolella S; Ferro R; Denotti G; Oberholtzer D; Mazzoleni S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Jun; 13(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 22762168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reattachment of fractured anterior teeth-determining fracture strength using different techniques: an in vitro study.
    Srilatha ; Joshi S; Chhasatia N; Rani PJ; Mathur E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 22430695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthodontic-restorative treatment of chipped or worn incisors.
    Goracci C; Gheewalla R; Kugel G; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11806481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The marginal seal of a flowable composite, an injectable resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer in primary molars--an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Madan M; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 14700335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of reattached incisor fragments with mini fibre-reinforced composite anchors.
    Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Wolke JG; Fokkinga WA; Machado C; Creugers NH
    J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 19339099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture strength of intact and fragment-bonded teeth at various velocities of the applied force.
    Farik B; Munksgaard EC
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1999 Feb; 107(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 10102753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance of composite resin restorations and porcelain veneers in relation to residual tooth structure in fractured incisors.
    Batalocco G; Lee H; Ercoli C; Feng C; Malmstrom H
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Feb; 28(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21752192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD; Das UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shear bond strength of restorations applied to un-complicated crown fractures: an in vitro study.
    Pamir T; Eden E; Sebahtin Ahmed S
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Apr; 28(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 22051058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite, compomer and resin modified glass ionomer in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Raj S; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Sep; 21(3):86-94. PubMed ID: 14703213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of airborne-particle abrasion on the shear bond strength of four restorative materials to enamel and dentin.
    Mujdeci A; Gokay O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 15343159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.