164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17661416)
1. Is waiting time a measure of access to liver transplantation? Is shorter necessarily better?
Freeman RB
Hepatology; 2007 Aug; 46(2):602-3. PubMed ID: 17661416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in access to liver transplantation: disease severity, waiting time, and transplantation center volume.
Ahmad J; Bryce CL; Cacciarelli T; Roberts MS
Ann Intern Med; 2007 May; 146(10):707-13. PubMed ID: 17502631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The sickest first? Disparities with model for end-stage liver disease-based organ allocation: one region's experience.
Schaffer RL; Kulkarni S; Harper A; Millis JM; Cronin DC
Liver Transpl; 2003 Nov; 9(11):1211-5. PubMed ID: 14586883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and organ allocation from cadaveric donors for 198 liver transplantation procedures performed in a single center.
Santori G; Andorno E; Morelli N; Casaccia M; Bottino G; Ghirelli R; Valente U
Transplant Proc; 2008; 40(6):1903-5. PubMed ID: 18675084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of the MELD score on waiting time and disease severity in liver transplantation in United States veterans.
Ahmad J; Downey KK; Akoad M; Cacciarelli TV
Liver Transpl; 2007 Nov; 13(11):1564-9. PubMed ID: 17969210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) system to allocate and to share livers: experience of two Italian centers.
Ravaioli M; Masetti M; Dazzi A; Romano A; Spaggiari M; Grazi GL; Ercolani G; Cescon M; Di Gioia P; De Ruvo N; Montalti R; Ballarin R; Di Benedetto F; Ridolfi L; Alvaro N; Ramacciato G; Morelli C; Gerunda E; Pinna AD
Transplant Proc; 2008; 40(6):1814-5. PubMed ID: 18675057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in a liver transplantation waiting list.
Ferraz-Neto BH; Hidalgo R; Thomé T; Melo VA; Lobue A; Zurstrassen MP; Moraes JM; Meira-Filho SP; Rezende MB; Fonseca LE; Pandullo FL; Soeiro FS; Afonso RC
Transplant Proc; 2007 Oct; 39(8):2511-3. PubMed ID: 17954160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes.
Trotter JF; Osgood MJ
JAMA; 2004 Apr; 291(15):1871-4. PubMed ID: 15100206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival benefit after liver transplantation: a single European center experience.
Ravaioli M; Grazi GL; Dazzi A; Bertuzzo V; Ercolani G; Cescon M; Cucchetti A; Masetti M; Ramacciato G; Pinna AD
Transplantation; 2009 Sep; 88(6):826-34. PubMed ID: 19920783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of MELD score and donor quality in liver transplantation: implications for the donor recipient match.
Avolio AW; Agnes S; Gasbarrini A; Nure E; Siciliano M; Castagneto M
Transplant Proc; 2006 May; 38(4):1059-62. PubMed ID: 16757263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinically relevant differences in the model for end-stage liver disease and model for end-stage liver disease-sodium scores determined at three university-based laboratories of the same area.
Xiol X; Gines P; Castells L; Twose J; Ribalta A; Fuentes-Arderiu X; Rodriguez S; Castellote J; Navasa M; Deulofeu R
Liver Transpl; 2009 Mar; 15(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19242993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aetiology of cirrhosis of the liver has an impact on survival predicted by the Model of End-stage Liver Disease score.
Angermayr B; Luca A; König F; Bertolini G; Ploner M; Gridelli B; Ulbrich G; Reiberger T; Bosch J; Peck-Radosavljevic M
Eur J Clin Invest; 2009 Jan; 39(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 19087131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of center volume on pancreas transplant outcomes.
Mandal AK; Drew N; Lapidus JA
Surgery; 2004 Aug; 136(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 15300184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score system to evaluate patients with viral hepatitis on the waiting list: better than the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) system?
Cuomo O; Perrella A; Arenga G
Transplant Proc; 2008; 40(6):1906-9. PubMed ID: 18675085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Model for end-stage liver disease: impact of the new deceased donor liver allocation policy in São Paulo, Brazil.
Monteiro F; Coria SA; Boni R; Pereira LA
Transplant Proc; 2009; 41(1):226-8. PubMed ID: 19249520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Split-liver transplantation in the high-MELD adult patient: are we being too cautious?
Nadalin S; Schaffer R; Fruehauf N
Transpl Int; 2009 Jul; 22(7):702-6. PubMed ID: 19254241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of the MELD allocation system and predictors of survival.
Ioannou GN; Perkins JD; Carithers RL
Gastroenterology; 2008 May; 134(5):1342-51. PubMed ID: 18471511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ABO blood group-related waiting list disparities in liver transplant candidates: effect of the MELD adoption.
Barone M; Avolio AW; Di Leo A; Burra P; Francavilla A
Transplantation; 2008 Mar; 85(6):844-9. PubMed ID: 18360266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved outcome of adult recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease score and a small-for-size graft.
Yi NJ; Suh KS; Lee HW; Shin WY; Kim J; Kim W; Kim YJ; Yoon JH; Lee HS; Lee KU
Liver Transpl; 2009 May; 15(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 19399732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can low volume liver transplant centers be successful? The Regional Transplant Center of Willis-Knighton & Louisiana State University Medical Center. The first 120 liver transplants.
McMillan RW; Uppot R; Zibari GB; Aultman DF; Dies DF; McDonald JC
J La State Med Soc; 1999 Jul; 151(7):367-72. PubMed ID: 10474983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
