160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17662630)
1. DXA-generated Z-scores and T-scores may differ substantially and significantly in young adults.
Carey JJ; Delaney MF; Love TE; Richmond BJ; Cromer BA; Miller PD; Manilla-McIntosh M; Lewis SA; Thomas CL; Licata AA
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 17662630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry diagnostic discordance between Z-scores and T-scores in young adults.
Carey JJ; Delaney MF; Love TE; Cromer BA; Miller PD; Richmond BJ; Manilla-McIntosh M; Lewis SA; Thomas CL; Licata AA
J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19195620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence.
Binkley N; Kiebzak GM; Lewiecki EM; Krueger D; Gangnon RE; Miller PD; Shepherd JA; Drezner MK
J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Feb; 20(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 15647812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with proximal femoral fractures--comparative study between quantitative ultrasonometry and gold standard DXA].
Schnabel M; Eser G; Ziller V; Mann D; Mann E; Hadji P
Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Oct; 130(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 16220445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of a phalangeal bone mineral density assessment system.
Patel R; Blake GM; Panayiotou E; Fogelman I
J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 20554233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.
Ribom EL; Ljunggren O; Mallmin H
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of precision error on T-scores and the diagnostic classification of bone status.
Kiebzak GM; Faulkner KG; Wacker W; Hamdy R; Seier E; Watts NB
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 17451984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low bone mineral density in hormone-naïve men with prostate carcinoma.
Smith MR; McGovern FJ; Fallon MA; Schoenfeld D; Kantoff PW; Finkelstein JS
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 91(12):2238-45. PubMed ID: 11413511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry-based assessment of male patients using standardized bone density values and a national reference database.
Goemaere S; Vanderschueren D; Kaufman JM; Reginster JY; Boutsen Y; Poriau S; Callens J; Raeman F; Depresseux G; Borghs H; Devogelaer JP; Boonen S; ;
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 17289523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An atlas improves interobserver agreement regarding application of the ISCD vertebral body exclusion criteria.
Hansen KE; Binkley N; Blank RD; Krueger DC; Christian RC; Malone DG; Baim S
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 17993400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. OST risk index and calcaneus bone densitometry in osteoporosis diagnosis.
Pérez-Castrillón JL; Sagredo MG; Conde R; del Pino-Montes J; de Luis D
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 17662631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. T-scores and Z-scores.
Shepherd JA; Blake GM
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(4):349-50. PubMed ID: 17993399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in a group of healthy Moroccan men.
El Maghraoui A; Ghazi M; Gassim S; Mounach A; Ghozlani I; Nouijai A; Achemlal L; Bezza A; Dehhaoui M
Bone; 2009 May; 44(5):965-9. PubMed ID: 19168162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of measurement of the contralateral hip if the spine is not included in the bone mineral density analysis.
Cole R; Larson J
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 16785083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discordance of longitudinal changes in bone density between densitometers.
Frost SA; Nguyen ND; Center JR; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
Bone; 2007 Oct; 41(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 17870039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of the Khon Kaen Osteoporosis Study (KKOS) score for identifying osteoporosis in men.
Pongchaiyakul C; Wanothayaroj E
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Aug; 90(8):1518-23. PubMed ID: 17926979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Difficulties in the interpretation of bone densitometric measurements].
Korczyk P; Hoszowski K; Bieńkowska R; Tałajko A; Lorenc R
Przegl Lek; 1997; 54(4):250-1, 254-5. PubMed ID: 9333875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of increasing vertebral marrow fat content on BMD measurement, T-Score status and fracture risk prediction by DXA.
Blake GM; Griffith JF; Yeung DK; Leung PC; Fogelman I
Bone; 2009 Mar; 44(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 19059505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of bone density in children with slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
Huberty DP; Szalay EA
J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 16439894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
