402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17662927)
1. Comparison of an automated confrontation testing device versus finger counting in the detection of field loss.
Bass SJ; Cooper J; Feldman J; Horn D
Optometry; 2007 Aug; 78(8):390-5. PubMed ID: 17662927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry.
Katz J; Quigley HA; Sommer A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jul; 36(8):1658-64. PubMed ID: 7601645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Humphrey visual field and frequency doubling perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
Chandrasekhar G; Kunjam V; Rao VS; Nutheti R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2003 Mar; 51(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 12701860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual field loss from primary angle-closure glaucoma: a comparative study of symptomatic and asymptomatic disease.
Ang LP; Aung T; Chua WH; Yip LW; Chew PT
Ophthalmology; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1636-40. PubMed ID: 15350315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma.
Chan KC; Poostchi A; Wong T; Insull EA; Sachdev N; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 17716733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.
Johnson CA; Samuels SJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):413-25. PubMed ID: 9040475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.
Newkirk MR; Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mean deviation fluctuation in eyes with stable Humphrey 24-2 visual fields.
Tattersall CL; Vernon SA; Menon GJ
Eye (Lond); 2007 Mar; 21(3):362-6. PubMed ID: 16424913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association of optic disc configuration and clustered visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes with hemifield visual field defects.
Nagai-Kusuhara A; Nakamura M; Kanamori A; Negi A
J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19142137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 11867588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multifocal blue-on-yellow visual evoked potentials in early glaucoma.
Klistorner A; Graham SL; Martins A; Grigg JR; Arvind H; Kumar RS; James AC; Billson FA
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1613-21. PubMed ID: 17822971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons.
Kerrigan-Baumrind LA; Quigley HA; Pease ME; Kerrigan DF; Mitchell RS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Mar; 41(3):741-8. PubMed ID: 10711689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Wishart PK
Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
