BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

961 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17664607)

  • 21. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
    Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
    Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A preliminary study of in-house Monte Carlo simulations: an integrated Monte Carlo verification system.
    Mukumoto N; Tsujii K; Saito S; Yasunaga M; Takegawa H; Yamamoto T; Numasaki H; Teshima T
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):571-9. PubMed ID: 19735883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
    Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].
    Treutwein M; Bogner L
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
    Krieger T; Sauer OA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Monte Carlo modeling of the ModuLeaf miniature MLC for small field dosimetry and quality assurance of the clinical treatment planning system.
    Crop F; Reynaert N; Pittomvils G; Paelinck L; De Gersem W; De Wagter C; Vakaet L; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3275-90. PubMed ID: 17505102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetric evaluations of intrafraction motion for gated and ungated intensity modulated arc therapy deliveries.
    Oliver M; Gladwish A; Staruch R; Craig J; Gaede S; Chen J; Wong E
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6419-36. PubMed ID: 18941277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations.
    Knöös T; Wieslander E; Cozzi L; Brink C; Fogliata A; Albers D; Nyström H; Lassen S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5785-807. PubMed ID: 17068365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
    Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dosimetric evaluation of a Monte Carlo IMRT treatment planning system incorporating the MIMiC.
    Rassiah-Szegedi P; Fuss M; Sheikh-Bagheri D; Szegedi M; Stathakis S; Lancaster J; Papanikolaou N; Salter B
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6931-41. PubMed ID: 18029985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm.
    Newhauser W; Fontenot J; Zheng Y; Polf J; Titt U; Koch N; Zhang X; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4569-84. PubMed ID: 17634651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison between PENELOPE and electron Monte Carlo simulations of electron fields used in the treatment of conjunctival lymphoma.
    Brualla L; Palanco-Zamora R; Wittig A; Sempau J; Sauerwein W
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5469-81. PubMed ID: 19706962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stereotactic, single-dose irradiation of lung tumors: a comparison of absolute dose and dose distribution between pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms based on actual patient CT scans.
    Chen H; Lohr F; Fritz P; Wenz F; Dobler B; Lorenz F; Mühlnickel W
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(3):955-63. PubMed ID: 20171796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A motion phantom study on helical tomotherapy: the dosimetric impacts of delivery technique and motion.
    Kanagaki B; Read PW; Molloy JA; Larner JM; Sheng K
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 17183139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of PENFAST--a fast Monte Carlo code for dose calculations in photon and electron radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Habib B; Poumarede B; Tola F; Barthe J
    Phys Med; 2010 Jan; 26(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 19342258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Monte Carlo evaluation of RapidArc oropharynx treatment planning strategies for sparing of midline structures.
    Bush K; Zavgorodni S; Gagne I; Townson R; Ansbacher W; Beckham W
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4465-79. PubMed ID: 20668338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.