These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17664648)

  • 1. The complete electrode model for EIT in a mammography geometry.
    Kim BS; Boverman G; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ; Isaacson D
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S57-69. PubMed ID: 17664648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A compensated radiolucent electrode array for combined EIT and mammography.
    Kao TJ; Saulnier GJ; Xia H; Tamma C; Newell JC; Isaacson D
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S291-9. PubMed ID: 17664644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A reconstruction algorithm for breast cancer imaging with electrical impedance tomography in mammography geometry.
    Choi MH; Kao TJ; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 54(4):700-10. PubMed ID: 17405377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast cancer detection using high-density flexible electrode arrays and electrical impedance tomography.
    Campisi MS; Barbre C; Chola A; Cunningham G; Woods V; Viventi J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():1131-4. PubMed ID: 25570162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of headnet electrode arrays for electrical impedance tomography of the human head.
    Tidswell AT; Bagshaw AP; Holder DS; Yerworth RJ; Eadie L; Murray S; Morgan L; Bayford RH
    Physiol Meas; 2003 May; 24(2):527-44. PubMed ID: 12812436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrode boundary conditions and experimental validation for BEM-based EIT forward and inverse solutions.
    Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Sep; 25(9):1180-8. PubMed ID: 16967803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography based on the complete electrode model.
    Vauhkonen PJ; Vauhkonen M; Savolainen T; Kaipio JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Sep; 46(9):1150-60. PubMed ID: 10493078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinguishability of inhomogeneities using planar electrode arrays and different patterns of applied excitation.
    Kao TJ; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ; Isaacson D
    Physiol Meas; 2003 May; 24(2):403-11. PubMed ID: 12812425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
    Boyle A; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental justification for using 3D conductivity reconstructions in electrical impedance tomography.
    Halter RJ; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S115-27. PubMed ID: 17664629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods for compensating for variable electrode contact in EIT.
    Boverman G; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Dec; 56(12):2762-72. PubMed ID: 19628445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual thorax geometry reduces position and size differences in reconstructed images of electrical impedance tomography.
    Zhao Z; Frerichs I; Pulletz S; Müller-Lisse U; Möller K
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(6):797-807. PubMed ID: 25408396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrical Impedance Tomography: Tissue Properties to Image Measures.
    Adler A; Boyle A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2494-2504. PubMed ID: 28715324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrical impedance tomography in 3D using two electrode planes: characterization and evaluation.
    Wagenaar J; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):922-37. PubMed ID: 27203154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct EIT reconstructions of complex admittivities on a chest-shaped domain in 2-D.
    Hamilton SJ; Mueller JL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Apr; 32(4):757-69. PubMed ID: 23314771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A local region of interest imaging method for electrical impedance tomography with internal electrodes.
    Kwon H; McEwan AL; Oh TI; Farooq A; Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():964918. PubMed ID: 23935705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EIT image reconstruction based on a hybrid FE-EFG forward method and the complete-electrode model.
    Hadinia M; Jafari R; Soleimani M
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):863-78. PubMed ID: 27203801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.