These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17665178)

  • 1. Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.
    Holmes NP; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 183(4):465-76. PubMed ID: 17665178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactions of different body parts in peripersonal space: how vision of the foot influences tactile perception at the hand.
    Schicke T; Bauer F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 192(4):703-15. PubMed ID: 18841353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multisensory stimulation with or without saccades: fMRI evidence for crossmodal effects on sensory-specific cortices that reflect multisensory location-congruence rather than task-relevance.
    Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):414-25. PubMed ID: 15907299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools.
    Holmes NP; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Nov; 372(1-2):62-7. PubMed ID: 15531089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.
    Holmes NP; Sanabria D; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 16483553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The left-right reversed visual feedback of the hand affects multisensory interaction within peripersonal space.
    Mine D; Narumi T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):285-294. PubMed ID: 37759149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Pavani F; Maravita A; Holmes N
    J Physiol Paris; 2004; 98(1-3):171-89. PubMed ID: 15477031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The multisensory attentional consequences of tool use: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Holmes NP; Spence C; Hansen PC; Mackay CE; Calvert GA
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3502. PubMed ID: 18958150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kimura Y; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17726605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tool use modulates early stages of visuo-tactile integration in far space: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Forsberg A; O'Dowd A; Gherri E
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jul; 145():42-54. PubMed ID: 30970269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the contribution of overt tactile expectations to visuo-tactile interactions within the peripersonal space.
    Kandula M; Van der Stoep N; Hofman D; Dijkerman HC
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Aug; 235(8):2511-2522. PubMed ID: 28528459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion.
    Zopf R; Savage G; Williams MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Feb; 48(3):713-25. PubMed ID: 19913040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction.
    Farnè A; Iriki A; Làdavas E
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 15707908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tool-use: capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space?
    Holmes NP; Sanabria D; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Cortex; 2007 Apr; 43(3):469-89. PubMed ID: 17533769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The magnetic touch illusion: A perceptual correlate of visuo-tactile integration in peripersonal space.
    Guterstam A; Zeberg H; Özçiftci VM; Ehrsson HH
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():44-56. PubMed ID: 27348406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When far is near: ERP correlates of crossmodal spatial interactions between tactile and mirror-reflected visual stimuli.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Aug; 500(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21683122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripersonal space around the upper and the lower limbs.
    Gherri E; Xu A; Ambron E; Sedda A
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Aug; 240(7-8):2039-2050. PubMed ID: 35727366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential neural processes of tactile-visual crossmodal working memory.
    Ohara S; Lenz F; Zhou YD
    Neuroscience; 2006 Apr; 139(1):299-309. PubMed ID: 16324794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.