These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17666029)

  • 1. It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks.
    Hajcak G; Moser JS; Holroyd CB; Simons RF
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Nov; 44(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 17666029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Error-related negativities elicited by monetary loss and cues that predict loss.
    Dunning JP; Hajcak G
    Neuroreport; 2007 Nov; 18(17):1875-8. PubMed ID: 18090330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
    Pfabigan DM; Alexopoulos J; Bauer H; Sailer U
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 21039585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetrical effects of frequent gains and frequent losses in a gambling task.
    Nittono H; Otsuka Y; Ullsperger P
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(13):1345-9. PubMed ID: 18695521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
    Bellebaum C; Polezzi D; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3343-50. PubMed ID: 20655319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feedback-related negativity reflects omission of monetary gains: Evidence from ERP gambling study.
    Yaple Z; Shestakova A; Klucharev V
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Nov; 686():145-149. PubMed ID: 30195974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feedback-related negativity is enhanced in adolescence during a gambling task with and without probabilistic reinforcement learning.
    Martínez-Velázquez ES; Ramos-Loyo J; González-Garrido AA; Sequeira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Jan; 26(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 25494471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice.
    Yeung N; Holroyd CB; Cohen JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 May; 15(5):535-44. PubMed ID: 15319308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancy between feedback negativity and subjective evaluation in gambling.
    Toyomaki A; Murohashi H
    Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1865-8. PubMed ID: 16237344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frontal theta oscillatory activity is a common mechanism for the computation of unexpected outcomes and learning rate.
    Mas-Herrero E; Marco-Pallarés J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):447-58. PubMed ID: 24188368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Yeung N; Holroyd CB; Schurger A; Cohen JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Jul; 14(7):741-7. PubMed ID: 15054053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An fMRI study of reward-related probability learning.
    Delgado MR; Miller MM; Inati S; Phelps EA
    Neuroimage; 2005 Feb; 24(3):862-73. PubMed ID: 15652321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulus-preceding negativity is modulated by action-outcome contingency.
    Masaki H; Yamazaki K; Hackley SA
    Neuroreport; 2010 Mar; 21(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 20134356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task.
    Krugliakova E; Klucharev V; Fedele T; Gorin A; Kuznetsova A; Shestakova A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 236(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 29196772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How we learn to make decisions: rapid propagation of reinforcement learning prediction errors in humans.
    Krigolson OE; Hassall CD; Handy TC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):635-44. PubMed ID: 24168216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Loss feedback negativity elicited by single- versus conjoined-feature stimuli.
    Liu Y; Gehring WJ
    Neuroreport; 2009 Apr; 20(6):632-6. PubMed ID: 19293730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Baseline EEG theta/beta ratio and punishment sensitivity as biomarkers for feedback-related negativity (FRN) and risk-taking.
    Massar SA; Rossi V; Schutter DJ; Kenemans JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Oct; 123(10):1958-65. PubMed ID: 22542439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of the magnitude, probability, and valence of potential wins and losses on the amplitude of the feedback negativity.
    Kreussel L; Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Hecht H; Coles MG; Miltner WH
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Feb; 49(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 22091824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Show me the Money: the impact of actual rewards and losses on the feedback negativity.
    Weinberg A; Riesel A; Proudfit GH
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Jun; 87():134-9. PubMed ID: 24735733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.