218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17666593)
1. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Darney PD; Rosenfield A
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):226-7. PubMed ID: 17666593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Richman S
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1169; author reply 1170. PubMed ID: 17978135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Voutsos LJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1169; author reply 1170. PubMed ID: 17978134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Battaglia F
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1169; author reply 1170. PubMed ID: 17978133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Brief supports partial-birth abortion ban.
Catholic Church. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops [USCCB]
Origins; 2006 Jun; 36(4):58-63. PubMed ID: 16832962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. Court in New York rejects partial-birth abortion ban.
Preston J
N Y Times Web; 2004 Aug; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15540363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Justices to review federal ban on disputed abortion method; case may hinge on Alito, Court's newest member.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 16514736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Roe versus reality--abortion and women's health.
Wright AA; Katz IT
N Engl J Med; 2006 Jul; 355(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16822990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The federal ban on so-called "partial-birth abortion" is a dangerous intrusion into medical practice.
Blumenthal PD
MedGenMed; 2003 Jun; 5(2):37. PubMed ID: 14603136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Congressional control of federal court jurisdiction: the case study of abortion.
Greenwood JS
S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(4):1069-112. PubMed ID: 16493841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Air Force women's access to abortion services and the erosion of 10 U.S.C., section 1093.
Wilde ML
William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):351-412. PubMed ID: 15977327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
Joersz M
N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Partial-truth abortion bans.
Kaminer W
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 16830438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely!
Massie AM
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
Burdick R
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions.
Zenkich S
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Court rules that government can't outlaw type of abortion: a Nebraska case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2000 Jun; ():A1. PubMed ID: 15586921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Big abortion: what the antiabortion movement can learn from big tobacco.
Heminger JD
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2005; 54(4):1273-311. PubMed ID: 17115504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Keeping watch: U.S. Supreme Court rulings.
Am Nurse; 2016; 48(1):4. PubMed ID: 27017685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
