These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Women's health and health reform: implications of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Johnson KA Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 22(6):492-7. PubMed ID: 20966751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The vagueness of partial-birth abortion bans: deconstruction or destruction? Rurka ML J Crim Law Criminol; 1999; 89(4):1233-68. PubMed ID: 14628850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Why hundreds of scientists are weighing in on a high-stakes US abortion case. Maxmen A Nature; 2021 Nov; 599(7884):187-189. PubMed ID: 34703018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The Court and abortion: worse than you think. Dworkin R New York Rev Books; 2007 May; 54(9):20-1. PubMed ID: 17517997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Substantive due process after Gonzales v. Carhart. Calabresi SG Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1517-42. PubMed ID: 18595213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Abortion Policy: Legal, Clinical, and Medical Education Considerations. Thaxton L; Gonzaga MI; Tristan S Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 66(4):759-772. PubMed ID: 37910072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Abrogating stare decisis by statute: may Congress remove the precedential effect of Roe and Casey? Paulsen MS Yale Law J; 2001; 109(7):1535-602. PubMed ID: 16281343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The paradox of judicial bypass proceedings. Raskin JB Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):281-5. PubMed ID: 16526132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Helping OB/GYN specialists screen midlife women for CHD. Med Manag Netw; 1999 Oct; 7(10):5-7. PubMed ID: 10623045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision. Buchbinder M; Mishtal J; Singer EO; Wendland CL Med Anthropol Q; 2022 Dec; 36(4):433-441. PubMed ID: 36433774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Abortion: the debate goes on. America (NY); 1977 Jul; 137(1):2. PubMed ID: 11664904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Constitutional persons: an exchange on abortion. Schlueter N; Bork RH First Things; 2003 Jan; (129):28-36. PubMed ID: 12731559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The male abortion: the putative father's right to terminate his interests in and obligations to the unborn child. McCulley MG J Law Policy; 1988; 7(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 12666677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Finance issue brief: women's health: direct access to providers. Plaza CI Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2000 Jun; ():1-5. PubMed ID: 11073417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. An inside look at partial birth abortion. Lowe LR Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998-1999; 24():327-57. PubMed ID: 16180289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. More on abortion training articles. Candib LM Fam Med; 2008 Jan; 40(1):7. PubMed ID: 18172789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. John Paul II and America's laws on life. Mullaney PJ Hum Life Rev; 2005; 31(3):78-86. PubMed ID: 16471017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Children not meant to be: protecting the interests of the child when abortion results in live birth. Casagrande KM Quinnipiac Health Law J; 2002; 6(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 16180297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]