These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1766685)

  • 1. A comparison of clinical acuity and contrast sensitivity charts: effect of uncorrected myopia.
    Bradley A; Hook J; Haeseker J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1991 Jul; 11(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 1766685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual performance after overnight orthokeratology.
    Johnson KL; Carney LG; Mountford JA; Collins MJ; Cluff S; Collins PK
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17215162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Refractive error and visual acuity changes in orthokeratology patients.
    Cheung SW; Cho P; Chui WS; Woo GC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):410-6. PubMed ID: 17502824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order aberrations following overnight orthokeratology.
    Hiraoka T; Okamoto C; Ishii Y; Kakita T; Oshika T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Feb; 48(2):550-6. PubMed ID: 17251449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual performance with night vision goggles after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.
    Subramanian PS; O'Kane B; Stefanik R; Stevens J; Rabin J; Bauer RM; Bower KS
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Mar; 110(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 12623815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of spherical and astigmatic defocus on acuity and contrast sensitivity: a comparison of three clinical charts.
    Bradley A; Thomas T; Kalaher M; Hoerres M
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jun; 68(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 1891193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reversibility of effects of orthokeratology on visual acuity, refractive error, corneal topography, and contrast sensitivity.
    Kobayashi Y; Yanai R; Chikamoto N; Chikama T; Ueda K; Nishida T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jul; 34(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 18787430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.
    Thayaparan K; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 91(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 17166891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Spatial contrast sensitivity in patients with severe myopia].
    Risse JF; Saint-Blancat P; Boissonnot M; Grillot L
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1996; 19(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 8734220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical contrast sensitivity chart evaluation.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 1454362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photorefractive keratectomy for pediatric anisometropia: safety and impact on refractive error, visual acuity, and stereopsis.
    Paysse EA; Hamill MB; Hussein MA; Koch DD
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 15234284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests.
    Elliott DB; Bullimore MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jan; 34(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 8425818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized prospective study.
    Hersh PS; Brint SF; Maloney RK; Durrie DS; Gordon M; Michelson MA; Thompson VM; Berkeley RB; Schein OD; Steinert RF
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Aug; 105(8):1512-22, discussion 1522-3. PubMed ID: 9709767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One-year clinical results after epi-LASIK for myopia.
    Katsanevaki VJ; Kalyvianaki MI; Kavroulaki DS; Pallikaris IG
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 17320960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iris-supported phakic lenses (rigid vs foldable version) for treating moderately high myopia: randomized paired eye comparison.
    Coullet J; Guëll JL; Fournié P; Grandjean H; Gaytan J; Arné JL; Malecaze F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 17049332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group.
    Steinert RF; Hersh PS
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1998; 96():197-221; discussion 221-7. PubMed ID: 10360290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds.
    Rabin J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Feb; 35(2):646-8. PubMed ID: 8113015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. United States Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for moderate to high myopia: three-year follow-up.
    Sanders DR; Doney K; Poco M;
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1683-92. PubMed ID: 15350323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.50 to 8.00 diopters of myopia.
    El-Maghraby A; Salah T; Waring GO; Klyce S; Ibrahim O
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Mar; 106(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 10080199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Implantation of phakic anterior chamber intraocular lens for the correction of severe myopia].
    Bi HS; Ma XH; Cai WT; Liu DM; Ji P
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 42(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16643730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.